CLRSF
Price
$0.04
Change
+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Updated
Jun 20 closing price
Capitalization
9.02M
RSNUF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.03 (-50.00%)
Updated
Feb 28 closing price
Capitalization
312.89M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLRSF vs RSNUF

Header iconCLRSF vs RSNUF Comparison
Open Charts CLRSF vs RSNUFBanner chart's image
CASTILE RES
Price$0.04
Change+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Volume$43K
Capitalization9.02M
RENASCOR RES
Price$0.03
Change-$0.03 (-50.00%)
Volume$20K
Capitalization312.89M
CLRSF vs RSNUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLRSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLRSF vs. RSNUF commentary
Jul 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLRSF is a Buy and RSNUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 01, 2025
Stock price -- (CLRSF: $0.04 vs. RSNUF: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: CLRSF and RSNUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLRSF: 138% vs. RSNUF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CLRSF: $9.02M vs. RSNUF: $312.89M
CLRSF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $9.02M. RSNUF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $312.89M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.07B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLRSF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRSNUF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CLRSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RSNUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CLRSF is a better buy in the long-term than RSNUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLRSF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CLRSF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

CLRSF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RSNUF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +35.82%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.27% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSNUF($313M) has a higher market cap than CLRSF($9.02M). CLRSF YTD gains are higher at: -27.083 vs. RSNUF (-45.667). RSNUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.81M vs. CLRSF (-2.61M).
CLRSFRSNUFCLRSF / RSNUF
Capitalization9.02M313M3%
EBITDA-2.61M-1.81M144%
Gain YTD-27.083-45.66759%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/A1.86M-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLRSFRSNUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
33%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
29%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
11%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
9%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
3%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
13%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLRSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AFALX11.630.07
+0.61%
Applied Finance Dividend Investor
RINCX18.460.11
+0.60%
Victory RS Science and Technology C
WASCX20.750.05
+0.24%
Macquarie Asset Strategy Fund Cl C
MSFJX19.660.04
+0.20%
MFS Total Return R4
CCSGX25.69N/A
N/A
Conestoga SMid Cap Institutional

CLRSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLRSF and GENMF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLRSF and GENMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLRSF
1D Price
Change %
CLRSF100%
N/A
GENMF - CLRSF
32%
Poorly correlated
-7.14%
FRSPF - CLRSF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LSANF - CLRSF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KNGRF - CLRSF
23%
Poorly correlated
+5.24%
ELMTF - CLRSF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.80%
More

RSNUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RSNUF and SGML have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RSNUF and SGML's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RSNUF
1D Price
Change %
RSNUF100%
N/A
SGML - RSNUF
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.39%
FNICF - RSNUF
13%
Poorly correlated
+1.76%
CLRSF - RSNUF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TCVNF - RSNUF
0%
Poorly correlated
+5.71%
NVAAF - RSNUF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More