CLRSF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 16 closing price
Capitalization
9.02M
GENMF
Price
$0.27
Change
-$0.03 (-10.34%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
54.09M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLRSF vs GENMF

Header iconCLRSF vs GENMF Comparison
Open Charts CLRSF vs GENMFBanner chart's image
CASTILE RES
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$123
Capitalization9.02M
Generation Mining
Price$0.27
Change-$0.03 (-10.34%)
Volume$155.99K
Capitalization54.09M
CLRSF vs GENMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLRSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GENMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLRSF vs. GENMF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLRSF is a Hold and GENMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CLRSF: $0.04 vs. GENMF: $0.26)
Brand notoriety: CLRSF and GENMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLRSF: 0% vs. GENMF: 76%
Market capitalization -- CLRSF: $9.02M vs. GENMF: $54.09M
CLRSF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $9.02M. GENMF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $54.09M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLRSF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGENMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CLRSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GENMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CLRSF is a better buy in the long-term than GENMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLRSF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GENMF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLRSF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • GENMF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLRSF is a better buy in the short-term than GENMF.

Price Growth

CLRSF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GENMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -6.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.74%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.18% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GENMF($54.1M) has a higher market cap than CLRSF($9.02M). GENMF YTD gains are higher at: 150.000 vs. CLRSF (-25.417). CLRSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.61M vs. GENMF (-49.87M).
CLRSFGENMFCLRSF / GENMF
Capitalization9.02M54.1M17%
EBITDA-2.61M-49.87M5%
Gain YTD-25.417150.000-17%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total CashN/A13.2M-
Total DebtN/A3.05M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GENMF: Fundamental Ratings
GENMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
19
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLRSFGENMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
11%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
13%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
17%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
16%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
18%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLRSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GENMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BFCC41.500.50
+1.22%
BankFirst Capital Corporation
SKBSY24.430.29
+1.18%
Skanska AB
AUMC0.55N/A
N/A
AURYN Mining Corporation
DGDCF0.11N/A
N/A
Dynasty Gold Corp.
COFAF18.39N/A
N/A
COFACE SA

CLRSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLRSF and GENMF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLRSF and GENMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLRSF
1D Price
Change %
CLRSF100%
N/A
GENMF - CLRSF
32%
Poorly correlated
-7.79%
FRSPF - CLRSF
25%
Poorly correlated
-4.72%
LSANF - CLRSF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.74%
KNGRF - CLRSF
23%
Poorly correlated
+5.41%
ELMTF - CLRSF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GENMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GENMF and CLRSF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GENMF and CLRSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GENMF
1D Price
Change %
GENMF100%
-7.79%
CLRSF - GENMF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PRMNF - GENMF
24%
Poorly correlated
-3.09%
CSCCF - GENMF
23%
Poorly correlated
-3.34%
AFMJF - GENMF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.00%
ARAAF - GENMF
20%
Poorly correlated
-5.18%
More