CLRSF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 16 closing price
Capitalization
9.02M
FRSPF
Price
$0.30
Change
-$0.01 (-3.23%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
15.27M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLRSF vs FRSPF

Header iconCLRSF vs FRSPF Comparison
Open Charts CLRSF vs FRSPFBanner chart's image
CASTILE RES
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$123
Capitalization9.02M
First Phosphate
Price$0.30
Change-$0.01 (-3.23%)
Volume$48.07K
Capitalization15.27M
CLRSF vs FRSPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLRSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FRSPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLRSF vs. FRSPF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLRSF is a Hold and FRSPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CLRSF: $0.04 vs. FRSPF: $0.30)
Brand notoriety: CLRSF and FRSPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLRSF: 0% vs. FRSPF: 76%
Market capitalization -- CLRSF: $9.02M vs. FRSPF: $15.27M
CLRSF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $9.02M. FRSPF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $15.27M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLRSF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFRSPF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CLRSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FRSPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CLRSF and FRSPF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLRSF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRSPF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLRSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • FRSPF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CLRSF and FRSPF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CLRSF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FRSPF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -6.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.74%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.18% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRSPF($15.3M) has a higher market cap than CLRSF($9.02M). FRSPF YTD gains are higher at: 71.429 vs. CLRSF (-25.417). FRSPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.07M vs. CLRSF (-2.61M).
CLRSFFRSPFCLRSF / FRSPF
Capitalization9.02M15.3M59%
EBITDA-2.61M-1.07M243%
Gain YTD-25.41771.429-36%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLRSFFRSPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
11%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
13%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
17%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
16%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
18%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLRSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FRSPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NHHHF0.05N/A
+3.00%
FUELPOSITIVE CORP.
RLLWF2.36N/A
N/A
Reliance Worldwide Corp Ltd.
MNPP1850.00N/A
N/A
Merchants National Properties, Inc.
MOGLF1.19-0.01
-0.83%
Mongolian Mining Corp.
LSRCY22.30-0.63
-2.75%
Lasertec Corp.

CLRSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLRSF and GENMF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLRSF and GENMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLRSF
1D Price
Change %
CLRSF100%
N/A
GENMF - CLRSF
32%
Poorly correlated
-7.79%
FRSPF - CLRSF
25%
Poorly correlated
-4.72%
LSANF - CLRSF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.74%
KNGRF - CLRSF
23%
Poorly correlated
+5.41%
ELMTF - CLRSF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FRSPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRSPF has been loosely correlated with ELMTF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRSPF jumps, then ELMTF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRSPF
1D Price
Change %
FRSPF100%
-4.72%
ELMTF - FRSPF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CLRSF - FRSPF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRGXF - FRSPF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.76%
TIGCF - FRSPF
22%
Poorly correlated
-4.32%
LSANF - FRSPF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.74%
More