CLRMF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
10.13M
GATO
Price
$14.40
Change
-$0.46 (-3.10%)
Updated
Jan 15 closing price
Capitalization
580.43M
35 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CLRMF vs GATO

Header iconCLRMF vs GATO Comparison
Open Charts CLRMF vs GATOBanner chart's image
Clean Air Metals
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$34.32K
Capitalization10.13M
Gatos Silver
Price$14.40
Change-$0.46 (-3.10%)
Volume$7.81M
Capitalization580.43M
CLRMF vs GATO Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLRMF vs. GATO commentary
Feb 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLRMF is a Hold and GATO is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 24, 2025
Stock price -- (CLRMF: $0.03 vs. GATO: $14.40)
Brand notoriety: CLRMF and GATO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLRMF: 23% vs. GATO: 160%
Market capitalization -- CLRMF: $10.13M vs. GATO: $580.43M
CLRMF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $10.13M. GATO’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $580.43M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLRMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGATO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CLRMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GATO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CLRMF is a better buy in the long-term than GATO.

Price Growth

CLRMF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -20.11% price change this week, while GATO (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +1.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.80%.

Reported Earning Dates

GATO is expected to report earnings on May 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+1.52% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GATO($580M) has a higher market cap than CLRMF($10.1M). GATO YTD gains are higher at: 3.004 vs. CLRMF (-15.406). GATO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 13.7M vs. CLRMF (-4.48M). GATO has more cash in the bank: 55.5M vs. CLRMF (9.95M). CLRMF has less debt than GATO: CLRMF (21.2K) vs GATO (39K). CLRMF (0) and GATO (0) have equivalent revenues.
CLRMFGATOCLRMF / GATO
Capitalization10.1M580M2%
EBITDA-4.48M13.7M-33%
Gain YTD-15.4063.004-513%
P/E RatioN/A46.94-
Revenue00-
Total Cash9.95M55.5M18%
Total Debt21.2K39K54%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL245.55-0.28
-0.11%
Apple
BTC.X96273.920000-303.835940
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY599.94-10.44
-1.71%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME26.42-0.62
-2.29%
GameStop Corp
TSLA337.80-16.60
-4.68%
Tesla

CLRMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLRMF and BAUFF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLRMF and BAUFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLRMF
1D Price
Change %
CLRMF100%
-2.89%
BAUFF - CLRMF
27%
Poorly correlated
-5.66%
BYAGF - CLRMF
23%
Poorly correlated
-6.39%
SLVMF - CLRMF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GATO - CLRMF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OR - CLRMF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.26%
More

GATO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GATO has been closely correlated with MAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GATO jumps, then MAG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GATO
1D Price
Change %
GATO100%
N/A
MAG - GATO
72%
Closely correlated
-6.69%
SILV - GATO
71%
Closely correlated
N/A
CDE - GATO
71%
Closely correlated
-10.49%
FSM - GATO
70%
Closely correlated
-8.49%
EXK - GATO
68%
Closely correlated
-7.91%
More