Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLQZX vs RGEBX
CLQZX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts CLQZX vs RGEBX
Columbia Disciplined Growth Inst
Price$12.45
Change+$0.02 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets318.12M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$77.54
Change+$0.22 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
CLQZX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLQZX vs. RGEBX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLQZX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. CLQZX (318M). CLQZX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . CLQZX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: CLQZX (15 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than CLQZX (0.90). CLQZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLQZX: RGEBX (250) vs CLQZX (2000). CLQZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.98 vs. RGEBX (5.18). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 19.19 vs. CLQZX (18.01).
| CLQZX | RGEBX | CLQZX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.08 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.08 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.759 | 8.539 | 138% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 318M | 339B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.98 | 5.18 | 154% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.64 | 62.27 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.01 | 19.19 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.48 | 88.81 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers