Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLQZX vs RGEBX
CLQZX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts CLQZX vs RGEBX
Columbia Disciplined Growth Inst
Price$11.59
Change-$0.08 (-0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets287.68M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$79.23
Change+$0.77 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
CLQZX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLQZX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jul 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLQZX is a StrongBuy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. CLQZX (288M). CLQZX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . CLQZX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: CLQZX (15 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.09) is less costly to investors than CLQZX (0.92). CLQZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLQZX: RGEBX (250) vs CLQZX (2000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.04 vs. CLQZX (-0.09). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 45.69 vs. CLQZX (16.60).
| CLQZX | RGEBX | CLQZX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.09 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.09 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.758 | 10.904 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288M | 323B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.09 | 10.04 | -1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.28 | 57.17 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.60 | 45.69 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.36 | 78.56 | 36% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement