Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLQZX vs RGEBX
CLQZX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts CLQZX vs RGEBX
Columbia Disciplined Growth Inst
Price$11.92
Change-$1.17 (-8.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.99M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$75.85
Change-$9.36 (-10.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
CLQZX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLQZX vs. RGEBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLQZX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. CLQZX (307M). CLQZX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . CLQZX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: CLQZX (15 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than CLQZX (0.90). CLQZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLQZX: RGEBX (250) vs CLQZX (2000). CLQZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.58 vs. RGEBX (1.80). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 9.88 vs. CLQZX (6.91).
| CLQZX | RGEBX | CLQZX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.08 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.08 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.773 | -1.057 | 262% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 307M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.58 | 1.80 | 310% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.19 | 41.63 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.91 | 9.88 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.96 | 110.02 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers