Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLQZX vs RGACX
CLQZX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts CLQZX vs RGACX
Columbia Disciplined Growth Inst
Price$13.05
Change-$0.29 (-2.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets313.01M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.05
Change-$1.88 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
CLQZX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLQZX vs. RGACX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLQZX is a Hold and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. CLQZX (313M). RGACX pays higher dividends than CLQZX: RGACX (0.07) vs CLQZX (0.00). CLQZX was incepted earlier than RGACX: CLQZX (15 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.94) and CLQZX (0.92) have similar cost to investors . CLQZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLQZX: RGACX (250) vs CLQZX (2000). RGACX (8.31) and CLQZX (8.10) have marching annual gain over last year. RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 37.90 vs. CLQZX (18.60).
| CLQZX | RGACX | CLQZX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.94 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.94 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.749 | 19.364 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 313M | 340B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.10 | 8.31 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.68 | 63.31 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.60 | 37.90 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.25 | 98.36 | 47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers