Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLQZX vs RGACX
CLQZX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts CLQZX vs RGACX
Columbia Disciplined Growth Inst
Price$12.87
Change+$0.06 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets310.34M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.70
Change+$0.17 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.3B
CLQZX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLQZX vs. RGACX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLQZX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. CLQZX (310M). RGACX pays higher dividends than CLQZX: RGACX (0.07) vs CLQZX (0.00). CLQZX was incepted earlier than RGACX: CLQZX (15 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) and CLQZX (0.92) have similar cost to investors . CLQZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLQZX: RGACX (250) vs CLQZX (2000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.01 vs. CLQZX (7.97). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 37.85 vs. CLQZX (14.52).
| CLQZX | RGACX | CLQZX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.94 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.94 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.530 | 17.655 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 310M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.97 | 11.01 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.68 | 70.57 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.52 | 37.85 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.86 | 96.78 | 43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement