Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLQZX vs GFFFX
CLQZX vs GFFFX Comparison
Open Charts CLQZX vs GFFFX
Columbia Disciplined Growth Inst
Price$12.36
Change+$0.11 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets299.46M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$85.79
Change+$0.89 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
CLQZX vs GFFFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLQZX vs. GFFFX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLQZX is a Buy and GFFFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. CLQZX (299M). GFFFX pays higher dividends than CLQZX: GFFFX (0.51) vs CLQZX (0.00). CLQZX was incepted earlier than GFFFX: CLQZX (15 years) vs GFFFX (17 years). CLQZX (0.92) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). CLQZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. GFFFX (25.00). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLQZX: GFFFX (250) vs CLQZX (2000). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.73 vs. CLQZX (11.78). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.50 vs. CLQZX (13.54).
| CLQZX | GFFFX | CLQZX / GFFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.40 | 203% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.40 | 230% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.772 | 15.936 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 299M | 332B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.78 | 18.73 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.84 | 60.96 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.54 | 43.50 | 31% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.51 | 101.61 | 39% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement