Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLQZX vs GFACX
CLQZX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts CLQZX vs GFACX
Columbia Disciplined Growth Inst
Price$12.87
Change+$0.06 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets310.34M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$74.77
Change+$0.15 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.3B
CLQZX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLQZX vs. GFACX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLQZX is a Hold and GFACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. CLQZX (310M). CLQZX (0.00) and GFACX (0.00) have matching dividends . CLQZX was incepted earlier than GFACX: CLQZX (15 years) vs GFACX (25 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than CLQZX (0.92). CLQZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLQZX: GFACX (250) vs CLQZX (2000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.41 vs. CLQZX (7.97). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 30.67 vs. CLQZX (14.52).
| CLQZX | GFACX | CLQZX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.36 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.36 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.530 | 17.268 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 310M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.97 | 9.41 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.68 | 64.76 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.52 | 30.67 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.86 | 80.65 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement