Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLQZX vs GAFFX
CLQZX vs GAFFX Comparison
Open Charts CLQZX vs GAFFX
Columbia Disciplined Growth Inst
Price$11.59
Change-$0.08 (-0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets287.68M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F3
Price$82.42
Change-$0.50 (-0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
CLQZX vs GAFFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLQZX vs. GAFFX commentary
Jul 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLQZX is a StrongBuy and GAFFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GAFFX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. CLQZX (288M). GAFFX pays higher dividends than CLQZX: GAFFX (0.61) vs CLQZX (0.00). CLQZX was incepted earlier than GAFFX: CLQZX (15 years) vs GAFFX (8 years). CLQZX (0.92) is less costly to investors than GAFFX (0.30). CLQZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. GAFFX (25.00). CLQZX has a lower initial minimum investment than GAFFX: CLQZX (2000) vs GAFFX (1000000). GAFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.26 vs. CLQZX (-0.09). GAFFX return over 5 years is better than : 51.33 vs. CLQZX (16.60).
| CLQZX | GAFFX | CLQZX / GAFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.30 | 270% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.30 | 307% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.758 | 11.347 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288M | 323B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.61 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.09 | 11.26 | -1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.28 | 60.93 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.60 | 51.33 | 32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.36 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement