Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLPYX vs RWMFX
CLPYX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts CLPYX vs RWMFX
Columbia Large Cap Index Inst3
Price$56.85
Change-$0.05 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.08B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.23
Change+$0.16 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.51B
CLPYX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLPYX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLPYX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 205B vs. CLPYX (3.08B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than CLPYX: RWMFX (1.43) vs CLPYX (1.11). CLPYX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: CLPYX (9 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). RWMFX (0.31) is less costly to investors than CLPYX (0.20). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. CLPYX (6.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLPYX: RWMFX (250) vs CLPYX (1000000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.95 vs. CLPYX (-0.29). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.81 vs. CLPYX (14.61).
| CLPYX | RWMFX | CLPYX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.20 | 0.31 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.20 | 0.31 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.116 | 8.213 | -14% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.08B | 205B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 1.43 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.29 | 7.95 | -4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.58 | 34.82 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.61 | 50.81 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 83.34 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement