CLPMF
Price
$0.15
Change
+$0.02 (+15.38%)
Updated
Jun 20 closing price
Capitalization
16.66M
TGL
Price
$1.10
Change
+$0.05 (+4.76%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
4.45M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLPMF vs TGL

Header iconCLPMF vs TGL Comparison
Open Charts CLPMF vs TGLBanner chart's image
Clip Money
Price$0.15
Change+$0.02 (+15.38%)
Volume$2.06K
Capitalization16.66M
Treasure Global
Price$1.10
Change+$0.05 (+4.76%)
Volume$168.11K
Capitalization4.45M
CLPMF vs TGL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLPMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TGL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLPMF vs. TGL commentary
Jul 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLPMF is a Hold and TGL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 01, 2025
Stock price -- (CLPMF: $0.15 vs. TGL: $1.10)
Brand notoriety: CLPMF and TGL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLPMF: 40% vs. TGL: 9%
Market capitalization -- CLPMF: $16.66M vs. TGL: $4.45M
CLPMF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $16.66M. TGL’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $4.45M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.74B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLPMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTGL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CLPMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TGL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TGL is a better buy in the long-term than CLPMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLPMF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TGL’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLPMF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TGL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TGL is a better buy in the short-term than CLPMF.

Price Growth

CLPMF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TGL (@Packaged Software) price change was +7.84% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.65%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+3.80% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLPMF($16.7M) has a higher market cap than TGL($4.45M). CLPMF YTD gains are higher at: -28.920 vs. TGL (-87.599). TGL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -8.23M vs. CLPMF (-9.96M). TGL has more cash in the bank: 1.23M vs. CLPMF (497K). TGL has less debt than CLPMF: TGL (55.4K) vs CLPMF (5.97M). TGL has higher revenues than CLPMF: TGL (53.6M) vs CLPMF (56.2K).
CLPMFTGLCLPMF / TGL
Capitalization16.7M4.45M376%
EBITDA-9.96M-8.23M121%
Gain YTD-28.920-87.59933%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue56.2K53.6M0%
Total Cash497K1.23M41%
Total Debt5.97M55.4K10,780%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLPMFTGL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
56%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
88%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLPMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TGL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ACI21.510.32
+1.51%
Albertsons Companies
FCPT26.910.17
+0.62%
Four Corners Property Trust
AACI10.050.02
+0.20%
Armada Acquisition Corp II
RWAY10.700.01
+0.14%
Runway Growth Finance Corp
MBIO0.96-0.07
-6.36%
Mustang Bio Inc

CLPMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLPMF and BTOW have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLPMF and BTOW's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLPMF
1D Price
Change %
CLPMF100%
N/A
BTOW - CLPMF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SDCH - CLPMF
5%
Poorly correlated
+19.82%
GRRR - CLPMF
3%
Poorly correlated
+4.97%
FOXO - CLPMF
1%
Poorly correlated
-7.38%
TGL - CLPMF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.94%
More

TGL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TGL has been closely correlated with DFDV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TGL jumps, then DFDV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TGL
1D Price
Change %
TGL100%
+4.76%
DFDV - TGL
71%
Closely correlated
+27.47%
CTEV - TGL
30%
Poorly correlated
+3.56%
YALA - TGL
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRNC - TGL
27%
Poorly correlated
+8.16%
KNAMF - TGL
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More