Advertisement
CLPMF vs SNTMF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLPMF is a Hold and SNTMF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLPMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSNTMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CLPMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SNTMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLPMF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SNTMF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CLPMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- SNTMF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CLPMF (@Computer Communications) experienced а -1.56% price change this week, while SNTMF (@Packaged Software) price change was +3.26% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -0.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +65.83%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +208.23%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Communications (-0.16% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
@Packaged Software (-1.05% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| CLPMF | SNTMF | CLPMF / SNTMF | |
| Capitalization | 18.1M | 11.9B | 0% |
| EBITDA | -4.43M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.958 | 132.325 | -11% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 4M | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 1.7M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 18.9M | N/A | - |
| CLPMF | SNTMF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 56% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 52% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 54% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 52% | 3 days ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 15 days ago 50% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 76% |
Advertisement
CLPMF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CLPMF and TGL have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLPMF and TGL's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLPMF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLPMF | 100% | +7.36% | ||
| TGL - CLPMF | 9% Poorly correlated | -1.87% | ||
| RUM - CLPMF | 5% Poorly correlated | +2.30% | ||
| SDCH - CLPMF | 3% Poorly correlated | +2.87% | ||
| CVOSF - CLPMF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SNTMF - CLPMF | -0% Poorly correlated | +32.76% | ||
More | ||||
SNTMF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SNTMF and DTSS have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SNTMF and DTSS's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNTMF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNTMF | 100% | +32.76% | ||
| DTSS - SNTMF | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MTHRF - SNTMF | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| URLOF - SNTMF | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.80% | ||
| LYFT - SNTMF | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.70% | ||
| SNAL - SNTMF | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.88% | ||
More | ||||