Advertisement
CLPMF vs RUM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLPMF is a Hold and RUM is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLPMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRUM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CLPMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- RUM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLPMF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RUM’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CLPMF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
- RUM’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CLPMF (@Computer Communications) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RUM (@Internet Software/Services) price change was -4.99% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +0.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.11%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Software/Services industry was +1.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +155.09%.
Reported Earning Dates
RUM is expected to report earnings on Apr 01, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Communications (+0.13% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
@Internet Software/Services (+1.39% weekly)Companies in this industry typically license software on a subscription basis and it is centrally hosted. Such products usually go by the names web-based software, on-demand software and hosted software. Cloud computing has emerged as a major force in this space, making it possible to save files to a remote database (without requiring them to be saved on local storage device); as long as a device has access to the web, it can access the data and the software programs to run it. This has in many cases facilitated cost efficiency, speed and security of data for businesses and consumers. Alphabet Inc., Facebook, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. are some well-known names in the internet software/services industry.
| CLPMF | RUM | CLPMF / RUM | |
| Capitalization | 14.5M | 2.13B | 1% |
| EBITDA | -4.58M | -97.44M | 5% |
| Gain YTD | -2.200 | -0.633 | 348% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 4.91M | 104M | 5% |
| Total Cash | 2.75M | 270M | 1% |
| Total Debt | 20.3M | 2.25M | 904% |
| CLPMF | RUM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 40% | 1 day ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 37% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 55% | 1 day ago 63% |
Advertisement
CLPMF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CLPMF and TGL have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLPMF and TGL's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLPMF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLPMF | 100% | N/A | ||
| TGL - CLPMF | 9% Poorly correlated | -2.57% | ||
| RUM - CLPMF | 5% Poorly correlated | -1.10% | ||
| SDCH - CLPMF | 3% Poorly correlated | -2.50% | ||
| CVOSF - CLPMF | 0% Poorly correlated | -0.45% | ||
| SNTMF - CLPMF | -0% Poorly correlated | +22.22% | ||
More | ||||
RUM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RUM has been loosely correlated with Z. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RUM jumps, then Z could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RUM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUM | 100% | -1.10% | ||
| Z - RUM | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.87% | ||
| IAC - RUM | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.39% | ||
| ZG - RUM | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.49% | ||
| OPRA - RUM | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.15% | ||
| YELP - RUM | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.61% | ||
More | ||||