Advertisement
CLPMF vs GRRR
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLPMF is a Hold and GRRR is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLPMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGRRR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CLPMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- GRRR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLPMF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GRRR’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CLPMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- GRRR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CLPMF (@Computer Communications) experienced а +22.47% price change this week, while GRRR (@Computer Communications) price change was +6.66% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +21.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +56.00%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Communications (+0.40% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
| CLPMF | GRRR | CLPMF / GRRR | |
| Capitalization | 21.4M | 387M | 6% |
| EBITDA | -4.99M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.398 | -5.537 | 79% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 6.06 | - |
| Revenue | 3.03M | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 2.75M | 4.28M | 64% |
| Total Debt | 17.5M | 32.9M | 53% |
| CLPMF | GRRR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 42% | 4 days ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 53% | 4 days ago 57% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 38% | 4 days ago 52% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 32% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 20 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 29 days ago 57% | 5 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 90% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CCQYX | 15.82 | 0.14 | +0.89% |
| Columbia Disciplined Core Inst3 | |||
| BRXRX | 15.68 | 0.05 | +0.32% |
| MFS Blended Research Intl Eq R1 | |||
| JDVSX | 16.69 | 0.04 | +0.24% |
| JPMorgan Diversified I | |||
| SSMHX | 330.48 | -0.54 | -0.16% |
| State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index | |||
| TPCIX | 29.52 | -0.11 | -0.37% |
| Timothy Plan Israel Common Values C | |||
CLPMF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CLPMF and BTOW have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLPMF and BTOW's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLPMF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLPMF | 100% | +22.47% | ||
| BTOW - CLPMF | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SDCH - CLPMF | 5% Poorly correlated | +2.79% | ||
| GRRR - CLPMF | 3% Poorly correlated | +8.46% | ||
| FOXO - CLPMF | 1% Poorly correlated | -6.30% | ||
| TGL - CLPMF | 1% Poorly correlated | +3.22% | ||
More | ||||
GRRR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GRRR has been closely correlated with NUTX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GRRR jumps, then NUTX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GRRR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRRR | 100% | +8.46% | ||
| NUTX - GRRR | 79% Closely correlated | -1.47% | ||
| SOPA - GRRR | 78% Closely correlated | +4.11% | ||
| MYSZ - GRRR | 76% Closely correlated | -0.79% | ||
| BKKT - GRRR | 76% Closely correlated | +8.53% | ||
| SMSI - GRRR | 76% Closely correlated | +0.86% | ||
More | ||||