CLPHY
Price
$8.73
Change
-$0.10 (-1.13%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
22.13B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KEP
Price
$17.43
Change
+$0.05 (+0.29%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
22.28B
78 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLPHY vs KEP

Header iconCLPHY vs KEP Comparison
Open Charts CLPHY vs KEPBanner chart's image
CLP Holdings
Price$8.73
Change-$0.10 (-1.13%)
Volume$42.7K
Capitalization22.13B
Korea Electric Power
Price$17.43
Change+$0.05 (+0.29%)
Volume$313.76K
Capitalization22.28B
CLPHY vs KEP Comparison Chart in %
CLPHY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KEP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLPHY vs. KEP commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLPHY is a Hold and KEP is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CLPHY: $8.86 vs. KEP: $17.38)
Brand notoriety: CLPHY and KEP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electric Utilities industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLPHY: 104% vs. KEP: 22%
Market capitalization -- CLPHY: $22.13B vs. KEP: $22.28B
CLPHY [@Electric Utilities] is valued at $22.13B. KEP’s [@Electric Utilities] market capitalization is $22.28B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electric Utilities] industry ranges from $176.92B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electric Utilities] industry is $23.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLPHY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileKEP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CLPHY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • KEP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, KEP is a better buy in the long-term than CLPHY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLPHY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KEP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLPHY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • KEP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KEP is a better buy in the short-term than CLPHY.

Price Growth

CLPHY (@Electric Utilities) experienced а +0.43% price change this week, while KEP (@Electric Utilities) price change was -2.63% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was -0.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

KEP is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electric Utilities (-0.76% weekly)

Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KEP($22.3B) and CLPHY($22.1B) have the same market capitalization . CLPHY has higher P/E ratio than KEP: CLPHY (15.04) vs KEP (3.99). KEP YTD gains are higher at: 152.616 vs. CLPHY (11.229). KEP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 13.26T vs. CLPHY (26.4B). KEP has higher revenues than CLPHY: KEP (94.99T) vs CLPHY (89.7B).
CLPHYKEPCLPHY / KEP
Capitalization22.1B22.3B99%
EBITDA26.4B13.26T0%
Gain YTD11.229152.6167%
P/E Ratio15.043.99377%
Revenue89.7B94.99T0%
Total CashN/A7.84T-
Total DebtN/A135.61T-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLPHY vs KEP: Fundamental Ratings
CLPHY
KEP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6532
SMR RATING
1..100
9958
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5037
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8146
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KEP's Valuation (80) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as CLPHY (95) in the null industry. This means that KEP’s stock grew similarly to CLPHY’s over the last 12 months.

KEP's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the Electric Utilities industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLPHY (65) in the null industry. This means that KEP’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLPHY’s over the last 12 months.

KEP's SMR Rating (58) in the Electric Utilities industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLPHY (99) in the null industry. This means that KEP’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLPHY’s over the last 12 months.

KEP's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as CLPHY (50) in the null industry. This means that KEP’s stock grew similarly to CLPHY’s over the last 12 months.

KEP's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the Electric Utilities industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLPHY (81) in the null industry. This means that KEP’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLPHY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLPHYKEP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 30 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLPHY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KEP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GMOI32.630.23
+0.71%
GMO International Value ETF
HFGO27.730.10
+0.35%
Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF
IUSV102.29N/A
N/A
iShares Core S&P US Value ETF
SMHB3.96-0.02
-0.48%
ETRACS 2xMnthly Py Lvrgd US SmCpHiDivETN
IHF48.44-0.24
-0.49%
iShares US Healthcare Providers ETF

CLPHY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLPHY and HRNNF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLPHY and HRNNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLPHY
1D Price
Change %
CLPHY100%
N/A
HRNNF - CLPHY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KEP - CLPHY
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.70%
CLPHF - CLPHY
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CKISF - CLPHY
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CKISY - CLPHY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A

KEP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KEP and BKH have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KEP and BKH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KEP
1D Price
Change %
KEP100%
+0.70%
BKH - KEP
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.94%
ETR - KEP
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.69%
NGGTF - KEP
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EVRG - KEP
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.31%
DTE - KEP
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.29%
More