CLPBF
Price
$92.27
Change
-$3.43 (-3.58%)
Updated
Sep 19 closing price
Capitalization
19.52B
CZMWY
Price
$49.49
Change
-$0.37 (-0.74%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
4.39B
75 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLPBF vs CZMWY

Header iconCLPBF vs CZMWY Comparison
Open Charts CLPBF vs CZMWYBanner chart's image
Coloplast AS
Price$92.27
Change-$3.43 (-3.58%)
Volume$200
Capitalization19.52B
Carl Zeiss Meditec AG
Price$49.49
Change-$0.37 (-0.74%)
Volume$4.31K
Capitalization4.39B
CLPBF vs CZMWY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLPBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CZMWY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLPBF vs. CZMWY commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLPBF is a Hold and CZMWY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CLPBF: $86.04 vs. CZMWY: $49.49)
Brand notoriety: CLPBF and CZMWY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Other industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLPBF: 19% vs. CZMWY: 98%
Market capitalization -- CLPBF: $19.52B vs. CZMWY: $4.39B
CLPBF [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] is valued at $19.52B. CZMWY’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] market capitalization is $4.39B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry ranges from $158.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry is $10.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLPBF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCZMWY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CLPBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CZMWY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CLPBF is a better buy in the long-term than CZMWY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLPBF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CZMWY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLPBF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CZMWY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLPBF is a better buy in the short-term than CZMWY.

Price Growth

CLPBF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а -6.75% price change this week, while CZMWY (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was -5.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was -1.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

CZMWY is expected to report earnings on Dec 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Other (-1.13% weekly)

Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLPBF($19.5B) has a higher market cap than CZMWY($4.39B). CLPBF has higher P/E ratio than CZMWY: CLPBF (30.23) vs CZMWY (24.64). CZMWY YTD gains are higher at: 5.963 vs. CLPBF (-14.787). CLPBF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.34B vs. CZMWY (226M). CLPBF has more cash in the bank: 726M vs. CZMWY (51.5M). CZMWY has less debt than CLPBF: CZMWY (147M) vs CLPBF (24.2B). CLPBF has higher revenues than CZMWY: CLPBF (27.9B) vs CZMWY (2.18B).
CLPBFCZMWYCLPBF / CZMWY
Capitalization19.5B4.39B444%
EBITDA8.34B226M3,689%
Gain YTD-14.7875.963-248%
P/E Ratio30.2324.64123%
Revenue27.9B2.18B1,280%
Total Cash726M51.5M1,410%
Total Debt24.2B147M16,463%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLPBF vs CZMWY: Fundamental Ratings
CLPBF
CZMWY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
913
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
3878
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6363
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7261
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CLPBF's Valuation (16) in the null industry is in the same range as CZMWY (30). This means that CLPBF’s stock grew similarly to CZMWY’s over the last 12 months.

CLPBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CZMWY (100). This means that CLPBF’s stock grew similarly to CZMWY’s over the last 12 months.

CLPBF's SMR Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CZMWY (78). This means that CLPBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CZMWY’s over the last 12 months.

CLPBF's Price Growth Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as CZMWY (63). This means that CLPBF’s stock grew similarly to CZMWY’s over the last 12 months.

CZMWY's P/E Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as CLPBF (72). This means that CZMWY’s stock grew similarly to CLPBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLPBFCZMWY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 29 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLPBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CZMWY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FITE84.501.02
+1.22%
SPDR® S&P Kensho Future Security ETF
KROP31.690.33
+1.05%
Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF
ILF28.640.18
+0.63%
iShares Latin America 40 ETF
HPF16.790.04
+0.24%
John Hancock Preferred Income Fund II
BTC48.35-0.07
-0.14%
Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF

CLPBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLPBF and BLCO have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLPBF and BLCO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLPBF
1D Price
Change %
CLPBF100%
N/A
BLCO - CLPBF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.90%
CLPBY - CLPBF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CZMWF - CLPBF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CZMWY - CLPBF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRSYF - CLPBF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CZMWY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CZMWY has been loosely correlated with CZMWF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CZMWY jumps, then CZMWF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CZMWY
1D Price
Change %
CZMWY100%
N/A
CZMWF - CZMWY
46%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SHWGY - CZMWY
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
XAIR - CZMWY
37%
Loosely correlated
+5.79%
IRME - CZMWY
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BNGO - CZMWY
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.34%
More