CLPBF
Price
$92.27
Change
-$3.43 (-3.58%)
Updated
Sep 19 closing price
Capitalization
19.52B
CZMWF
Price
$50.00
Change
-$1.06 (-2.08%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
4.39B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLPBF vs CZMWF

Header iconCLPBF vs CZMWF Comparison
Open Charts CLPBF vs CZMWFBanner chart's image
Coloplast AS
Price$92.27
Change-$3.43 (-3.58%)
Volume$200
Capitalization19.52B
Carl Zeiss Meditec AG
Price$50.00
Change-$1.06 (-2.08%)
Volume$200
Capitalization4.39B
CLPBF vs CZMWF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLPBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CZMWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLPBF vs. CZMWF commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLPBF is a Hold and CZMWF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CLPBF: $86.04 vs. CZMWF: $50.00)
Brand notoriety: CLPBF and CZMWF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Other industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLPBF: 19% vs. CZMWF: 229%
Market capitalization -- CLPBF: $19.52B vs. CZMWF: $4.39B
CLPBF [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] is valued at $19.52B. CZMWF’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] market capitalization is $4.39B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry ranges from $158.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry is $10.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLPBF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCZMWF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CLPBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CZMWF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CLPBF and CZMWF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLPBF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CZMWF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLPBF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CZMWF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLPBF is a better buy in the short-term than CZMWF.

Price Growth

CLPBF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а -6.75% price change this week, while CZMWF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was -2.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was -1.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.48%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Other (-1.13% weekly)

Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLPBF($19.5B) has a higher market cap than CZMWF($4.39B). CLPBF has higher P/E ratio than CZMWF: CLPBF (30.23) vs CZMWF (24.90). CZMWF YTD gains are higher at: 6.154 vs. CLPBF (-14.787). CLPBF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.34B vs. CZMWF (226M). CLPBF has more cash in the bank: 726M vs. CZMWF (51.5M). CZMWF has less debt than CLPBF: CZMWF (147M) vs CLPBF (24.2B). CLPBF has higher revenues than CZMWF: CLPBF (27.9B) vs CZMWF (2.18B).
CLPBFCZMWFCLPBF / CZMWF
Capitalization19.5B4.39B444%
EBITDA8.34B226M3,689%
Gain YTD-14.7876.154-240%
P/E Ratio30.2324.90121%
Revenue27.9B2.18B1,280%
Total Cash726M51.5M1,410%
Total Debt24.2B147M16,463%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLPBF vs CZMWF: Fundamental Ratings
CLPBF
CZMWF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9127
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
3878
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6362
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7245
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7546

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CLPBF's Valuation (16) in the null industry is in the same range as CZMWF (30). This means that CLPBF’s stock grew similarly to CZMWF’s over the last 12 months.

CLPBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CZMWF (100). This means that CLPBF’s stock grew similarly to CZMWF’s over the last 12 months.

CLPBF's SMR Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CZMWF (78). This means that CLPBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CZMWF’s over the last 12 months.

CZMWF's Price Growth Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as CLPBF (63). This means that CZMWF’s stock grew similarly to CLPBF’s over the last 12 months.

CZMWF's P/E Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as CLPBF (72). This means that CZMWF’s stock grew similarly to CLPBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLPBFCZMWF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 29 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLPBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CZMWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FDG119.310.49
+0.41%
American Century Foc Dynmc Gr ETF
IPAC73.340.20
+0.27%
iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF
BNDD100.08N/A
N/A
Quadratic Deflation ETF
PMAP25.68N/A
N/A
PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - April
FLMB23.59-0.02
-0.08%
Franklin Municipal Green Bond ETF

CLPBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLPBF and BLCO have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLPBF and BLCO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLPBF
1D Price
Change %
CLPBF100%
N/A
BLCO - CLPBF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.90%
CLPBY - CLPBF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CZMWF - CLPBF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CZMWY - CLPBF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRSYF - CLPBF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CZMWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CZMWF has been loosely correlated with CZMWY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CZMWF jumps, then CZMWY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CZMWF
1D Price
Change %
CZMWF100%
N/A
CZMWY - CZMWF
46%
Loosely correlated
N/A
XAIR - CZMWF
31%
Poorly correlated
+5.79%
SHWGY - CZMWF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ECIA - CZMWF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IRME - CZMWF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More