Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLOU vs SMH
CLOU vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts CLOU vs SMH
Global X Cloud Computing ETF
Price$23.25
Change-$0.63 (-2.64%)
Volume$84.58K
Net Assets298.53M
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$344.82
Change-$10.71 (-3.01%)
Volume$10.65M
Net Assets37.62B
CLOU vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLOU vs. SMH commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLOU is a Buy and SMH is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 37.6B vs. CLOU (299M). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than CLOU: SMH (46.810) vs CLOU (-2.963). CLOU was incepted earlier than SMH: CLOU (7 years) vs SMH (14 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than CLOU (0.68). CLOU has a higher turnover SMH (15.00) vs SMH (15.00).
| CLOU | SMH | CLOU / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | -2.963 | 46.810 | -6% |
| Net Assets | 299M | 37.6B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.35 | 194% |
| Turnover | 21.22 | 15.00 | 141% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.30 | - |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CLOU | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 3 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 18 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 8 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CLOU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLOU has been closely correlated with HUBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLOU jumps, then HUBS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLOU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLOU | 100% | -2.64% | ||
| HUBS - CLOU | 80% Closely correlated | -1.05% | ||
| FIVN - CLOU | 78% Closely correlated | -2.48% | ||
| NOW - CLOU | 77% Closely correlated | -1.66% | ||
| CRM - CLOU | 76% Closely correlated | -2.27% | ||
| PCOR - CLOU | 74% Closely correlated | -3.47% | ||
More | ||||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | +1.28% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 87% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| NVDA - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| TSM - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | -0.19% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 81% Closely correlated | +1.41% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 81% Closely correlated | +0.90% | ||
More | ||||