CLOQ
Price
$0.29
Change
-$0.02 (-6.45%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
PRGS
Price
$68.50
Change
-$0.36 (-0.52%)
Updated
Dec 18, 03:01 PM (EDT)
34 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CLOQ vs PRGS

Header iconCLOQ vs PRGS Comparison
Open Charts CLOQ vs PRGSBanner chart's image
Cyberloq Technologies
Price$0.29
Change-$0.02 (-6.45%)
Volume$21.15K
CapitalizationN/A
Progress Software
Price$68.50
Change-$0.36 (-0.52%)
Volume$400
CapitalizationN/A
CLOQ vs PRGS Comparison Chart
Loading...
PRGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLOQ vs. PRGS commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLOQ is a Hold and PRGS is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (CLOQ: $0.29 vs. PRGS: $68.86)
Brand notoriety: CLOQ and PRGS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLOQ: 164% vs. PRGS: 88%
Market capitalization -- CLOQ: $8.03M vs. PRGS: $2.3B
CLOQ [@Packaged Software] is valued at $8.03M. PRGS’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $2.3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLOQ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePRGS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CLOQ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PRGS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PRGS is a better buy in the long-term than CLOQ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PRGS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • PRGS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

CLOQ (@Packaged Software) experienced а +20.98% price change this week, while PRGS (@Packaged Software) price change was +0.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +4.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +17.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.40%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLOQ is expected to report earnings on May 12, 2023.

PRGS is expected to report earnings on Apr 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+4.84% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PRGS($2.3B) has a higher market cap than CLOQ($8.03M). CLOQ YTD gains are higher at: 166.055 vs. PRGS (28.063). PRGS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 214M vs. CLOQ (-485.05K). PRGS has more cash in the bank: 127M vs. CLOQ (18.7K). CLOQ has less debt than PRGS: CLOQ (275K) vs PRGS (747M). PRGS has higher revenues than CLOQ: PRGS (694M) vs CLOQ (3.36K).
CLOQPRGSCLOQ / PRGS
Capitalization8.03M2.3B0%
EBITDA-485.05K214M-0%
Gain YTD166.05528.063592%
P/E RatioN/A33.61-
Revenue3.36K694M0%
Total Cash18.7K127M0%
Total Debt275K747M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLOQ vs PRGS: Fundamental Ratings
CLOQ
PRGS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8915
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6017
SMR RATING
1..100
10050
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3541
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10056
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PRGS's Valuation (78) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as CLOQ (94) in the null industry. This means that PRGS’s stock grew similarly to CLOQ’s over the last 12 months.

PRGS's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLOQ (60) in the null industry. This means that PRGS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLOQ’s over the last 12 months.

PRGS's SMR Rating (50) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLOQ (100) in the null industry. This means that PRGS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLOQ’s over the last 12 months.

CLOQ's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as PRGS (41) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CLOQ’s stock grew similarly to PRGS’s over the last 12 months.

PRGS's P/E Growth Rating (56) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLOQ (100) in the null industry. This means that PRGS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLOQ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PRGS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
PRGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME31.261.82
+6.18%
GameStop Corp
TSLA479.8616.84
+3.64%
Tesla
AAPL253.482.44
+0.97%
Apple
BTC.X106140.600000110.890625
+0.10%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY604.29-2.50
-0.41%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust

CLOQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLOQ and BNZI have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLOQ and BNZI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLOQ
1D Price
Change %
CLOQ100%
-7.02%
BNZI - CLOQ
25%
Poorly correlated
-4.20%
NEMTF - CLOQ
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SDCH - CLOQ
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.47%
PRGS - CLOQ
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.36%
CCOEY - CLOQ
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.97%
More

PRGS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PRGS has been loosely correlated with INST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PRGS jumps, then INST could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PRGS
1D Price
Change %
PRGS100%
-0.36%
INST - PRGS
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BLKB - PRGS
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.89%
AMPL - PRGS
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.77%
TDOC - PRGS
37%
Loosely correlated
-5.71%
PD - PRGS
37%
Loosely correlated
-3.07%
More