Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLOD vs SMH
CLOD vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts CLOD vs SMH
Themes Cloud Computing ETF
Price$31.78
Change+$0.17 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.29M
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$396.61
Change+$8.26 (+2.13%)
Volume$147.97K
Net Assets41.15B
CLOD vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLOD vs. SMH commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLOD is a Hold and SMH is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 41.1B vs. CLOD (1.29M). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than CLOD: SMH (7.836) vs CLOD (-2.868). CLOD was incepted earlier than SMH: CLOD (2 years) vs SMH (14 years). CLOD (0.35) and SMH (0.35) have comparable expense ratios . CLOD (15.00) and SMH (15.00) have matching turnover.
| CLOD | SMH | CLOD / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | -2.868 | 7.836 | -37% |
| Net Assets | 1.29M | 41.1B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.35 | 100% |
| Turnover | 15.00 | 15.00 | 100% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.31 | - |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CLOD | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 8 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CLOD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLOD has been loosely correlated with RBRK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLOD jumps, then RBRK could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLOD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLOD | 100% | -2.01% | ||
| RBRK - CLOD | 53% Loosely correlated | -3.78% | ||
| GOOGL - CLOD | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.04% | ||
| FFIV - CLOD | 8% Poorly correlated | -0.87% | ||
| WIX - CLOD | 6% Poorly correlated | -2.56% | ||
| MDB - CLOD | 5% Poorly correlated | -5.91% | ||
More | ||||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | -0.81% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 87% Closely correlated | -0.51% | ||
| NVDA - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | -1.44% | ||
| TSM - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | -1.24% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 82% Closely correlated | -2.61% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 81% Closely correlated | -0.98% | ||
More | ||||