Advertisement
CLOD vs GOOGL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLOD is a Hold and GOOGL is a Hold.
GOOGL | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 25 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 26 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 10 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 27 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 3 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 25 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CLOD | GOOGL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 51% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 50% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 53% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 68% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MQY | 11.57 | -0.02 | -0.17% |
| Blackrock Muni Yield Quality Fund | |||
| OPP | 8.07 | -0.03 | -0.37% |
| RiverNorth/DoubleLine Strategic Opportunity Fund | |||
| TCHI | 24.63 | -0.14 | -0.55% |
| iShares MSCI China Multisector Tech ETF | |||
| IEMG | 67.77 | -0.76 | -1.11% |
| iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | |||
| ETHA | 23.94 | -1.85 | -7.17% |
| iShares Ethereum Trust ETF | |||
CLOD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLOD has been loosely correlated with RBRK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLOD jumps, then RBRK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLOD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLOD | 100% | -4.20% | ||
| RBRK - CLOD | 54% Loosely correlated | -4.65% | ||
| GOOGL - CLOD | 11% Poorly correlated | -2.84% | ||
| FFIV - CLOD | 8% Poorly correlated | -0.54% | ||
| WIX - CLOD | 6% Poorly correlated | -4.28% | ||
| MDB - CLOD | 5% Poorly correlated | -3.90% | ||
More | ||||
GOOGL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GOOGL has been closely correlated with GOOG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 99% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GOOGL jumps, then GOOG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GOOGL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GOOGL | 100% | -2.84% | ||
| GOOG - GOOGL | 99% Closely correlated | -2.89% | ||
| DASH - GOOGL | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.66% | ||
| META - GOOGL | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.14% | ||
| CARG - GOOGL | 44% Loosely correlated | +1.60% | ||
| SNAP - GOOGL | 40% Loosely correlated | -5.61% | ||
More | ||||