CLNXF
Price
$29.26
Change
+$0.13 (+0.45%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
19.69B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
JLL
Price
$329.60
Change
+$5.34 (+1.65%)
Updated
Dec 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
15.28B
89 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLNXF vs JLL

Header iconCLNXF vs JLL Comparison
Open Charts CLNXF vs JLLBanner chart's image
Cellnex Telecom SA
Price$29.26
Change+$0.13 (+0.45%)
Volume$896
Capitalization19.69B
Jones Lang LaSalle
Price$329.60
Change+$5.34 (+1.65%)
Volume$3.56K
Capitalization15.28B
CLNXF vs JLL Comparison Chart in %
CLNXF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
JLL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLNXF vs. JLL commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLNXF is a Hold and JLL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CLNXF: $30.40 vs. JLL: $324.56)
Brand notoriety: CLNXF and JLL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLNXF: 211% vs. JLL: 22%
Market capitalization -- CLNXF: $20.1B vs. JLL: $15.28B
CLNXF [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $20.1B. JLL’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $15.28B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $4.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLNXF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileJLL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CLNXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • JLL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, JLL is a better buy in the long-term than CLNXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLNXF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JLL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLNXF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • JLL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CLNXF and JLL are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CLNXF (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -0.25% price change this week, while JLL (@Real Estate Development) price change was -1.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -0.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.91%.

Reported Earning Dates

JLL is expected to report earnings on Mar 03, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (-0.37% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLNXF($19.7B) has a higher market cap than JLL($15.3B). CLNXF has higher P/E ratio than JLL: CLNXF (71.54) vs JLL (24.82). JLL YTD gains are higher at: 28.214 vs. CLNXF (-6.006). CLNXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.15B vs. JLL (1.24B). CLNXF has more cash in the bank: 1.46B vs. JLL (401M). JLL has less debt than CLNXF: JLL (4.11B) vs CLNXF (21.9B). JLL has higher revenues than CLNXF: JLL (24.7B) vs CLNXF (4.09B).
CLNXFJLLCLNXF / JLL
Capitalization19.7B15.3B129%
EBITDA3.15B1.24B253%
Gain YTD-6.00628.214-21%
P/E Ratio71.5424.82288%
Revenue4.09B24.7B17%
Total Cash1.46B401M364%
Total Debt21.9B4.11B533%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLNXF vs JLL: Fundamental Ratings
CLNXF
JLL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10035
SMR RATING
1..100
9893
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8043
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6056
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

JLL's Valuation (89) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CLNXF (99) in the null industry. This means that JLL’s stock grew similarly to CLNXF’s over the last 12 months.

JLL's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLNXF (100) in the null industry. This means that JLL’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLNXF’s over the last 12 months.

JLL's SMR Rating (93) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CLNXF (98) in the null industry. This means that JLL’s stock grew similarly to CLNXF’s over the last 12 months.

JLL's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLNXF (80) in the null industry. This means that JLL’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLNXF’s over the last 12 months.

JLL's P/E Growth Rating (56) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CLNXF (60) in the null industry. This means that JLL’s stock grew similarly to CLNXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLNXFJLL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
66%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLNXF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
JLL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
INTW61.118.86
+16.96%
GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF
OCIO37.610.14
+0.38%
ClearShares OCIO ETF
IUS57.220.14
+0.24%
Invesco RAFI™ Strategic US ETF
BBJP68.24-0.05
-0.07%
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF
QDIV34.74-0.19
-0.54%
Global X S&P 500® Quality Dividend ETF

CLNXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLNXF has been loosely correlated with CLLNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLNXF jumps, then CLLNY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLNXF
1D Price
Change %
CLNXF100%
N/A
CLLNY - CLNXF
49%
Loosely correlated
N/A
VONOY - CLNXF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NMRK - CLNXF
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
JLL - CLNXF
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.22%
VNNVF - CLNXF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

JLL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JLL has been closely correlated with CBRE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if JLL jumps, then CBRE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JLL
1D Price
Change %
JLL100%
+0.22%
CBRE - JLL
91%
Closely correlated
N/A
CWK - JLL
86%
Closely correlated
-1.92%
NMRK - JLL
82%
Closely correlated
+0.35%
CIGI - JLL
79%
Closely correlated
-0.04%
MMI - JLL
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.83%
More