CLNXF
Price
$31.16
Change
+$0.46 (+1.50%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
20.87B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
JLL
Price
$301.88
Change
-$5.38 (-1.75%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
14.25B
109 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLNXF vs JLL

Header iconCLNXF vs JLL Comparison
Open Charts CLNXF vs JLLBanner chart's image
Cellnex Telecom SA
Price$31.16
Change+$0.46 (+1.50%)
Volume$155
Capitalization20.87B
Jones Lang LaSalle
Price$301.88
Change-$5.38 (-1.75%)
Volume$244.58K
Capitalization14.25B
CLNXF vs JLL Comparison Chart in %
CLNXF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
JLL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLNXF vs. JLL commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLNXF is a Hold and JLL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (CLNXF: $30.71 vs. JLL: $307.26)
Brand notoriety: CLNXF and JLL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLNXF: 48% vs. JLL: 85%
Market capitalization -- CLNXF: $20.87B vs. JLL: $14.25B
CLNXF [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $20.87B. JLL’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $14.25B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $4.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLNXF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileJLL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CLNXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • JLL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, JLL is a better buy in the long-term than CLNXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLNXF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JLL’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLNXF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • JLL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, JLL is a better buy in the short-term than CLNXF.

Price Growth

CLNXF (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -1.00% price change this week, while JLL (@Real Estate Development) price change was +6.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +0.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.84%.

Reported Earning Dates

JLL is expected to report earnings on Mar 03, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+0.62% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLNXF($20.9B) has a higher market cap than JLL($14.2B). CLNXF has higher P/E ratio than JLL: CLNXF (71.54) vs JLL (23.13). JLL YTD gains are higher at: 21.379 vs. CLNXF (-5.063). CLNXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.15B vs. JLL (1.24B). CLNXF has more cash in the bank: 1.46B vs. JLL (401M). JLL has less debt than CLNXF: JLL (4.11B) vs CLNXF (21.9B). JLL has higher revenues than CLNXF: JLL (24.7B) vs CLNXF (4.09B).
CLNXFJLLCLNXF / JLL
Capitalization20.9B14.2B147%
EBITDA3.15B1.24B253%
Gain YTD-5.06321.379-24%
P/E Ratio71.5423.13309%
Revenue4.09B24.7B17%
Total Cash1.46B401M364%
Total Debt21.9B4.11B533%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLNXF vs JLL: Fundamental Ratings
CLNXF
JLL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8817
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10036
SMR RATING
1..100
9893
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8045
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6159
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

JLL's Valuation (95) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CLNXF (99) in the null industry. This means that JLL’s stock grew similarly to CLNXF’s over the last 12 months.

JLL's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLNXF (100) in the null industry. This means that JLL’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLNXF’s over the last 12 months.

JLL's SMR Rating (93) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CLNXF (98) in the null industry. This means that JLL’s stock grew similarly to CLNXF’s over the last 12 months.

JLL's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLNXF (80) in the null industry. This means that JLL’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLNXF’s over the last 12 months.

JLL's P/E Growth Rating (59) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CLNXF (61) in the null industry. This means that JLL’s stock grew similarly to CLNXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLNXFJLL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLNXF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
JLL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ISWN21.660.10
+0.45%
Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF
QQQJ37.260.09
+0.24%
Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF
BFOR81.130.17
+0.21%
Barron's 400 ETF
THIR32.370.05
+0.15%
THOR Index Rotation ETF
IWY281.18-0.48
-0.17%
iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF

CLNXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLNXF has been loosely correlated with CLLNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLNXF jumps, then CLLNY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLNXF
1D Price
Change %
CLNXF100%
+1.45%
CLLNY - CLNXF
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.66%
VONOY - CLNXF
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.41%
NMRK - CLNXF
33%
Loosely correlated
-1.09%
JLL - CLNXF
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.41%
VNNVF - CLNXF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

JLL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JLL has been closely correlated with CBRE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if JLL jumps, then CBRE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JLL
1D Price
Change %
JLL100%
-0.41%
CBRE - JLL
90%
Closely correlated
+0.32%
CWK - JLL
84%
Closely correlated
-0.06%
NMRK - JLL
81%
Closely correlated
-1.09%
CIGI - JLL
79%
Closely correlated
-0.03%
MMI - JLL
64%
Loosely correlated
-2.23%
More