CLNXF
Price
$38.77
Change
+$0.27 (+0.70%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
28.88B
CRBJF
Price
$3.60
Change
-$0.33 (-8.40%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
33.02B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLNXF vs CRBJF

Header iconCLNXF vs CRBJF Comparison
Open Charts CLNXF vs CRBJFBanner chart's image
Cellnex Telecom SA
Price$38.77
Change+$0.27 (+0.70%)
Volume$2.4K
Capitalization28.88B
China Resources Land
Price$3.60
Change-$0.33 (-8.40%)
Volume$164
Capitalization33.02B
CLNXF vs CRBJF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLNXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CRBJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLNXF vs. CRBJF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLNXF is a Hold and CRBJF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CLNXF: $38.77 vs. CRBJF: $3.60)
Brand notoriety: CLNXF and CRBJF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLNXF: 322% vs. CRBJF: 29%
Market capitalization -- CLNXF: $28.88B vs. CRBJF: $33.02B
CLNXF [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $28.88B. CRBJF’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $33.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLNXF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCRBJF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CLNXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CRBJF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CRBJF is a better buy in the long-term than CLNXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLNXF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CRBJF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLNXF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CRBJF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLNXF is a better buy in the short-term than CRBJF.

Price Growth

CLNXF (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -0.32% price change this week, while CRBJF (@Real Estate Development) price change was -8.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +2.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.21%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+2.35% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRBJF($33B) has a higher market cap than CLNXF($28.9B). CRBJF YTD gains are higher at: 26.316 vs. CLNXF (19.864). CRBJF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 62.9B vs. CLNXF (2.67B). CRBJF has more cash in the bank: 108B vs. CLNXF (243M). CLNXF has less debt than CRBJF: CLNXF (21.1B) vs CRBJF (186B). CRBJF has higher revenues than CLNXF: CRBJF (212B) vs CLNXF (3.54B).
CLNXFCRBJFCLNXF / CRBJF
Capitalization28.9B33B88%
EBITDA2.67B62.9B4%
Gain YTD19.86426.31675%
P/E RatioN/A7.36-
Revenue3.54B212B2%
Total Cash243M108B0%
Total Debt21.1B186B11%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLNXF vs CRBJF: Fundamental Ratings
CLNXF
CRBJF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9054
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5244
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1626
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
16n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CRBJF's Valuation (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLNXF (99). This means that CRBJF’s stock grew significantly faster than CLNXF’s over the last 12 months.

CRBJF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CLNXF (100). This means that CRBJF’s stock grew similarly to CLNXF’s over the last 12 months.

CRBJF's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLNXF (90). This means that CRBJF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLNXF’s over the last 12 months.

CRBJF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as CLNXF (52). This means that CRBJF’s stock grew similarly to CLNXF’s over the last 12 months.

CLNXF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is in the same range as CRBJF (26). This means that CLNXF’s stock grew similarly to CRBJF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLNXFCRBJF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
31%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
36%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
38%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
35%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
63%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLNXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CRBJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SYRE15.760.26
+1.68%
Spyre Therapeutics
BOX33.260.44
+1.34%
BOX
DDC12.000.10
+0.84%
DDC Enterprise Limited
EML23.700.18
+0.77%
Eastern Company
HUM239.68-4.11
-1.69%
Humana

CLNXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLNXF has been loosely correlated with VONOY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLNXF jumps, then VONOY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLNXF
1D Price
Change %
CLNXF100%
N/A
VONOY - CLNXF
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.58%
VNNVF - CLNXF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CAIAF - CLNXF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRBJF - CLNXF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SUHJY - CLNXF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.67%
More

CRBJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CRBJF and DDCCF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CRBJF and DDCCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRBJF
1D Price
Change %
CRBJF100%
N/A
DDCCF - CRBJF
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.08%
SIOLY - CRBJF
25%
Poorly correlated
-9.09%
AEI - CRBJF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.91%
CLNXF - CRBJF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CDEVF - CRBJF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More