CLNN
Price
$3.99
Change
-$0.28 (-6.56%)
Updated
Feb 4 closing price
Capitalization
48.29M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
LW
Price
$47.78
Change
+$1.49 (+3.22%)
Updated
Feb 4 closing price
Capitalization
6.64B
56 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLNN vs LW

Header iconCLNN vs LW Comparison
Open Charts CLNN vs LWBanner chart's image
Clene
Price$3.99
Change-$0.28 (-6.56%)
Volume$40.16K
Capitalization48.29M
Lamb Weston Holdings
Price$47.78
Change+$1.49 (+3.22%)
Volume$4.59M
Capitalization6.64B
CLNN vs LW Comparison Chart in %
CLNN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLNN vs. LW commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLNN is a StrongBuy and LW is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (CLNN: $3.99 vs. LW: $47.78)
Brand notoriety: CLNN and LW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLNN: 20% vs. LW: 148%
Market capitalization -- CLNN: $48.29M vs. LW: $6.64B
CLNN [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $48.29M. LW’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $6.64B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $258.93B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLNN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CLNN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LW is a better buy in the long-term than CLNN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLNN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LW’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLNN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LW’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLNN is a better buy in the short-term than LW.

Price Growth

CLNN (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а -18.74% price change this week, while LW (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was +5.96% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was +1.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +238.76%.

Reported Earning Dates

LW is expected to report earnings on Apr 02, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (+1.51% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LW($6.64B) has a higher market cap than CLNN($48.3M). LW YTD gains are higher at: 15.012 vs. CLNN (-32.027). LW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.12B vs. CLNN (-26.5M). CLNN has less debt than LW: CLNN (21.3M) vs LW (3.95B). LW has higher revenues than CLNN: LW (6.47B) vs CLNN (214K).
CLNNLWCLNN / LW
Capitalization48.3M6.64B1%
EBITDA-26.5M1.12B-2%
Gain YTD-32.02715.012-213%
P/E RatioN/A17.31-
Revenue214K6.47B0%
Total Cash7.93MN/A-
Total Debt21.3M3.95B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLNN vs LW: Fundamental Ratings
CLNN
LW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5319
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10040
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6562
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9579
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LW's Valuation (27) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLNN (81) in the null industry. This means that LW’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLNN’s over the last 12 months.

LW's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as CLNN (100) in the null industry. This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to CLNN’s over the last 12 months.

LW's SMR Rating (40) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLNN (100) in the null industry. This means that LW’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLNN’s over the last 12 months.

LW's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as CLNN (65) in the null industry. This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to CLNN’s over the last 12 months.

LW's P/E Growth Rating (79) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as CLNN (95) in the null industry. This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to CLNN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLNNLW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLNN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FKMCF0.140.01
+7.61%
FOKUS MNG CORP.
AKZOY23.431.11
+4.97%
Akzo Nobel N.V.
DNLMY16.11N/A
N/A
Dunelm Group PLC
WELPP65.75-0.10
-0.15%
Wisconsin Electric Power Co.
ANRGF1.58-0.06
-3.51%
Anaergia Inc.

CLNN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLNN has been loosely correlated with SMPL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLNN jumps, then SMPL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLNN
1D Price
Change %
CLNN100%
-6.56%
SMPL - CLNN
48%
Loosely correlated
+3.81%
DDC - CLNN
47%
Loosely correlated
-6.64%
NCRA - CLNN
46%
Loosely correlated
-12.47%
LW - CLNN
40%
Loosely correlated
+3.22%
LYRA - CLNN
40%
Loosely correlated
-4.80%
More

LW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LW has been loosely correlated with SMPL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LW jumps, then SMPL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LW
1D Price
Change %
LW100%
+3.22%
SMPL - LW
63%
Loosely correlated
+3.81%
FLO - LW
52%
Loosely correlated
+5.26%
ATPC - LW
51%
Loosely correlated
+6.33%
BRCC - LW
47%
Loosely correlated
+4.05%
LSF - LW
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.08%
More