Advertisement
CLNN vs DARE
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLNN is a Hold and DARE is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLNN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileDARE’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CLNN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- DARE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLNN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DARE’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CLNN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
- DARE’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CLNN (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а -3.32% price change this week, while DARE (@Biotechnology) price change was -1.67% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was +0.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was +193.01%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was +2.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +47.65%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Major Diversified (+0.23% weekly)Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.
@Biotechnology (+2.75% weekly)Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.
| CLNN | DARE | CLNN / DARE | |
| Capitalization | 61.6M | 27.8M | 222% |
| EBITDA | -25.3M | -17.84M | 142% |
| Gain YTD | 15.254 | -33.974 | -45% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 0.10 | - |
| Revenue | 286K | -17.7K | -1,616% |
| Total Cash | 7.29M | 5.04M | 145% |
| Total Debt | 20.8M | 3.03M | 686% |
CLNN | DARE | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 15 | 10 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 81 Overvalued | 79 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 88 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 96 | 78 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 28 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
DARE's Valuation (79) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as CLNN (81) in the null industry. This means that DARE’s stock grew similarly to CLNN’s over the last 12 months.
DARE's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as CLNN (100) in the null industry. This means that DARE’s stock grew similarly to CLNN’s over the last 12 months.
DARE's SMR Rating (100) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as CLNN (100) in the null industry. This means that DARE’s stock grew similarly to CLNN’s over the last 12 months.
CLNN's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DARE (88) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that CLNN’s stock grew somewhat faster than DARE’s over the last 12 months.
DARE's P/E Growth Rating (78) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as CLNN (96) in the null industry. This means that DARE’s stock grew similarly to CLNN’s over the last 12 months.
| CLNN | DARE | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 6 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 89% | 14 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 6 days ago 82% |
Advertisement
CLNN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLNN has been closely correlated with RIGL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLNN jumps, then RIGL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLNN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLNN | 100% | -4.38% | ||
| RIGL - CLNN | 92% Closely correlated | -1.25% | ||
| DARE - CLNN | 88% Closely correlated | +0.98% | ||
| PHIO - CLNN | 83% Closely correlated | -3.12% | ||
| IMRN - CLNN | 80% Closely correlated | -2.58% | ||
| LYRA - CLNN | 40% Loosely correlated | +3.43% | ||
More | ||||
DARE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DARE has been closely correlated with CLNN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DARE jumps, then CLNN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DARE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DARE | 100% | +0.98% | ||
| CLNN - DARE | 88% Closely correlated | -4.38% | ||
| PHIO - DARE | 81% Closely correlated | -3.12% | ||
| AZTR - DARE | 78% Closely correlated | -2.61% | ||
| FGHQF - DARE | 45% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| MNMD - DARE | 44% Loosely correlated | +4.30% | ||
More | ||||