CLNN
Price
$3.79
Change
+$0.11 (+2.99%)
Updated
Aug 11, 11:37 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
33.06M
CYDY
Price
$0.26
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
322.31M
79 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLNN vs CYDY

Header iconCLNN vs CYDY Comparison
Open Charts CLNN vs CYDYBanner chart's image
Clene
Price$3.79
Change+$0.11 (+2.99%)
Volume$400
Capitalization33.06M
CytoDyn
Price$0.26
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.32M
Capitalization322.31M
CLNN vs CYDY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLNN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CYDY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLNN vs. CYDY commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLNN is a Hold and CYDY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (CLNN: $3.68 vs. CYDY: $0.26)
Brand notoriety: CLNN and CYDY are both not notable
CLNN represents the Food: Major Diversified, while CYDY is part of the Biotechnology industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLNN: 73% vs. CYDY: 99%
Market capitalization -- CLNN: $33.06M vs. CYDY: $322.31M
CLNN [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $33.06M. CYDY’s [@Biotechnology] market capitalization is $322.31M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $230.18B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Biotechnology] industry ranges from $93.98B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $6.93B. The average market capitalization across the [@Biotechnology] industry is $1.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLNN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCYDY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CLNN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CYDY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CYDY is a better buy in the long-term than CLNN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLNN’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CYDY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLNN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CYDY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLNN is a better buy in the short-term than CYDY.

Price Growth

CLNN (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а +5.44% price change this week, while CYDY (@Biotechnology) price change was -11.99% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -0.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +834.73%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was +22.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +31.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.31%.

Reported Earning Dates

CYDY is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-0.80% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

@Biotechnology (+22.49% weekly)

Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CYDY($322M) has a higher market cap than CLNN($33.1M). CYDY YTD gains are higher at: 134.754 vs. CLNN (-30.697). CYDY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.59M vs. CLNN (-24.01M). CYDY has more cash in the bank: 11.9M vs. CLNN (9.83M). CLNN has less debt than CYDY: CLNN (20.9M) vs CYDY (27.3M). CLNN has higher revenues than CYDY: CLNN (350K) vs CYDY (0).
CLNNCYDYCLNN / CYDY
Capitalization33.1M322M10%
EBITDA-24.01M8.59M-279%
Gain YTD-30.697134.754-23%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue350K0-
Total Cash9.83M11.9M83%
Total Debt20.9M27.3M77%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLNN vs CYDY: Fundamental Ratings
CLNN
CYDY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5257
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
95100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CYDY's Valuation (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLNN (79). This means that CYDY’s stock grew significantly faster than CLNN’s over the last 12 months.

CYDY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CLNN (100). This means that CYDY’s stock grew similarly to CLNN’s over the last 12 months.

CYDY's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CLNN (100). This means that CYDY’s stock grew similarly to CLNN’s over the last 12 months.

CLNN's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as CYDY (57). This means that CLNN’s stock grew similarly to CYDY’s over the last 12 months.

CLNN's P/E Growth Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as CYDY (100). This means that CLNN’s stock grew similarly to CYDY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLNNCYDY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLNN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CYDY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AATSX19.620.14
+0.72%
Ancora/Thelen Small-Mid Cap S
MAFOX9.100.06
+0.66%
BlackRock Large Cap Focus Growth Instl
TRZZX56.79-0.13
-0.23%
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Stock Z
LGOSX29.00-0.07
-0.24%
Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities R4
RFISX17.18-0.16
-0.92%
Ranger Small Cap Institutional

CLNN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLNN has been closely correlated with RIGL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLNN jumps, then RIGL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLNN
1D Price
Change %
CLNN100%
+0.27%
RIGL - CLNN
92%
Closely correlated
+4.14%
DARE - CLNN
88%
Closely correlated
-5.88%
PHIO - CLNN
83%
Closely correlated
N/A
IMRN - CLNN
80%
Closely correlated
+5.56%
LYRA - CLNN
40%
Loosely correlated
-2.76%
More

CYDY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CYDY and TNXP have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CYDY and TNXP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CYDY
1D Price
Change %
CYDY100%
-1.72%
TNXP - CYDY
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.92%
AGNPF - CYDY
21%
Poorly correlated
+13.58%
CLNN - CYDY
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.27%
GNNSF - CYDY
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GNMSF - CYDY
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More