CLNN
Price
$3.98
Change
-$0.29 (-6.79%)
Updated
Feb 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
50.76M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CVNZF
Price
$0.40
Change
-$0.06 (-13.04%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
61.38M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLNN vs CVNZF

Header iconCLNN vs CVNZF Comparison
Open Charts CLNN vs CVNZFBanner chart's image
Clene
Price$3.98
Change-$0.29 (-6.79%)
Volume$1.75K
Capitalization50.76M
Comvita New Zealand
Price$0.40
Change-$0.06 (-13.04%)
Volume$2.5K
Capitalization61.38M
CLNN vs CVNZF Comparison Chart in %
CLNN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CVNZF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLNN vs. CVNZF commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLNN is a Hold and CVNZF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (CLNN: $4.27 vs. CVNZF: $0.40)
Brand notoriety: CLNN and CVNZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLNN: 45% vs. CVNZF: 135%
Market capitalization -- CLNN: $50.76M vs. CVNZF: $61.38M
CLNN [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $50.76M. CVNZF’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $61.38M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $251.22B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLNN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCVNZF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CLNN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CVNZF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CLNN and CVNZF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLNN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CVNZF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLNN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CVNZF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CLNN and CVNZF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CLNN (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а -17.73% price change this week, while CVNZF (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was +16.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was +1.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +238.78%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (+1.23% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CVNZF($61.4M) has a higher market cap than CLNN($50.8M). CVNZF YTD gains are higher at: -7.441 vs. CLNN (-27.257). CLNN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -26.5M vs. CVNZF (-64.63M). CVNZF has higher revenues than CLNN: CVNZF (201M) vs CLNN (214K).
CLNNCVNZFCLNN / CVNZF
Capitalization50.8M61.4M83%
EBITDA-26.5M-64.63M41%
Gain YTD-27.257-7.441366%
P/E RatioN/A20.71-
Revenue214K201M0%
Total Cash7.93MN/A-
Total Debt21.3MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLNN vs CVNZF: Fundamental Ratings
CLNN
CVNZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5298
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10097
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6588
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9597
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5055

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CVNZF's Valuation (51) in the null industry is in the same range as CLNN (81). This means that CVNZF’s stock grew similarly to CLNN’s over the last 12 months.

CVNZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CLNN (100). This means that CVNZF’s stock grew similarly to CLNN’s over the last 12 months.

CVNZF's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as CLNN (100). This means that CVNZF’s stock grew similarly to CLNN’s over the last 12 months.

CLNN's Price Growth Rating (65) in the null industry is in the same range as CVNZF (88). This means that CLNN’s stock grew similarly to CVNZF’s over the last 12 months.

CLNN's P/E Growth Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as CVNZF (97). This means that CLNN’s stock grew similarly to CVNZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLNNCVNZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
14%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
24%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
83%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLNN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CVNZF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSLA421.960.15
+0.04%
Tesla
AAPL269.48-0.53
-0.20%
Apple
SPY689.53-5.88
-0.85%
State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X75633.550000-3055.218800
-3.88%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME24.52-1.33
-5.15%
GameStop Corp

CLNN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLNN has been loosely correlated with LYRA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLNN jumps, then LYRA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLNN
1D Price
Change %
CLNN100%
+5.69%
LYRA - CLNN
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.98%
KYMR - CLNN
36%
Loosely correlated
+2.12%
VERA - CLNN
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.35%
KZIA - CLNN
33%
Poorly correlated
-2.26%
GOSS - CLNN
30%
Poorly correlated
+7.66%
More

CVNZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CVNZF and LYSFF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CVNZF and LYSFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CVNZF
1D Price
Change %
CVNZF100%
+16.91%
LYSFF - CVNZF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OTLY - CVNZF
20%
Poorly correlated
-4.66%
JBS - CVNZF
16%
Poorly correlated
+1.59%
FPAFY - CVNZF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.01%
CLNN - CVNZF
3%
Poorly correlated
+5.69%
More