CLNE
Price
$2.15
Change
+$0.06 (+2.87%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
582.65M
30 days until earnings call
CLSZF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.01 (-33.33%)
Updated
May 19 closing price
Capitalization
175.67M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLNE vs CLSZF

Header iconCLNE vs CLSZF Comparison
Open Charts CLNE vs CLSZFBanner chart's image
Clean Energy Fuels
Price$2.15
Change+$0.06 (+2.87%)
Volume$2.17M
Capitalization582.65M
China Oil & Gas Group
Price$0.02
Change-$0.01 (-33.33%)
Volume$1.2K
Capitalization175.67M
CLNE vs CLSZF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLNE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLSZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLNE vs. CLSZF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLNE is a Hold and CLSZF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CLNE: $2.09 vs. CLSZF: $0.02)
Brand notoriety: CLNE and CLSZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil Refining/Marketing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLNE: 0% vs. CLSZF: 105%
Market capitalization -- CLNE: $582.65M vs. CLSZF: $175.67M
CLNE [@Oil Refining/Marketing] is valued at $582.65M. CLSZF’s [@Oil Refining/Marketing] market capitalization is $175.67M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil Refining/Marketing] industry ranges from $73.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil Refining/Marketing] industry is $8.79B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLNE’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCLSZF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CLNE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CLSZF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CLNE is a better buy in the long-term than CLSZF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLNE’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLSZF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLNE’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CLSZF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLSZF is a better buy in the short-term than CLNE.

Price Growth

CLNE (@Oil Refining/Marketing) experienced а +10.58% price change this week, while CLSZF (@Oil Refining/Marketing) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil Refining/Marketing industry was +2.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLNE is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil Refining/Marketing (+2.37% weekly)

The Oil Refining/Marketing segment includes companies that refine crude oil into a number of petroleum products, including gasoline, jet fuel and diesel, and then sell the usable products to the end users. These companies are involved in what’s called downstream operations in the oil business. They also engage in the marketing and distribution of crude oil and natural gas products. In other words, the downstream oil and gas business is focused on post-production processes of crude oil and natural gas. When oil prices slump, downstream businesses are hurt less or in some cases even benefit, since their purchase cost of crude oil goes down. Some of the biggest U.S. oil refining/marketing companies include Phillips 66, Marathon Petroleum Corporation and Valero Energy Corp.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLNE($583M) has a higher market cap than CLSZF($176M). CLSZF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. CLNE (-16.733). CLSZF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.57B vs. CLNE (-31.92M). CLSZF has more cash in the bank: 3.69B vs. CLNE (263M). CLNE has less debt than CLSZF: CLNE (361M) vs CLSZF (8.77B). CLSZF has higher revenues than CLNE: CLSZF (15.6B) vs CLNE (425M).
CLNECLSZFCLNE / CLSZF
Capitalization583M176M331%
EBITDA-31.92M2.57B-1%
Gain YTD-16.7330.000-
P/E RatioN/A1.61-
Revenue425M15.6B3%
Total Cash263M3.69B7%
Total Debt361M8.77B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLNE vs CLSZF: Fundamental Ratings
CLNE
CLSZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9636
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4982
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
394
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CLSZF's Valuation (53) in the null industry is in the same range as CLNE (81) in the Gas Distributors industry. This means that CLSZF’s stock grew similarly to CLNE’s over the last 12 months.

CLSZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CLNE (100) in the Gas Distributors industry. This means that CLSZF’s stock grew similarly to CLNE’s over the last 12 months.

CLSZF's SMR Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLNE (96) in the Gas Distributors industry. This means that CLSZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLNE’s over the last 12 months.

CLNE's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Gas Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLSZF (82) in the null industry. This means that CLNE’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLSZF’s over the last 12 months.

CLNE's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Gas Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLSZF (94) in the null industry. This means that CLNE’s stock grew significantly faster than CLSZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLNECLSZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
89%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
87%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
29%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
31%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
31%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
85%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
87%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLNE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLSZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MCGAX10.830.15
+1.40%
Transamerica Mid Cap Growth A
BMCCX18.810.19
+1.02%
BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Gr Inv C
RGRLX11.530.11
+0.96%
RBC Global Equity Leaders R6
FIVCX35.700.23
+0.65%
Macquarie Opportunity C
JBATX30.260.11
+0.36%
JHancock Balanced R2

CLNE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLNE has been loosely correlated with PSX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLNE jumps, then PSX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLNE
1D Price
Change %
CLNE100%
N/A
PSX - CLNE
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.66%
DINO - CLNE
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.38%
PBF - CLNE
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.13%
MPC - CLNE
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.91%
PARR - CLNE
36%
Loosely correlated
+5.43%
More

CLSZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLSZF and CTXAF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLSZF and CTXAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLSZF
1D Price
Change %
CLSZF100%
N/A
CTXAF - CLSZF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLNE - CLSZF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PARR - CLSZF
7%
Poorly correlated
+5.43%
UGP - CLSZF
6%
Poorly correlated
+2.42%
AMTX - CLSZF
6%
Poorly correlated
+16.79%
More