CLLXF
Price
$0.52
Change
+$0.02 (+4.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
35.08M
CSRNF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
2.91M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLLXF vs CSRNF

Header iconCLLXF vs CSRNF Comparison
Open Charts CLLXF vs CSRNFBanner chart's image
Callinex Mines
Price$0.52
Change+$0.02 (+4.00%)
Volume$2.26K
Capitalization35.08M
Canstar Resources
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$30K
Capitalization2.91M
CLLXF vs CSRNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLLXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CSRNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLLXF vs. CSRNF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLLXF is a Hold and CSRNF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CLLXF: $0.52 vs. CSRNF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: CLLXF and CSRNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLLXF: 37% vs. CSRNF: 24%
Market capitalization -- CLLXF: $35.08M vs. CSRNF: $2.91M
CLLXF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $35.08M. CSRNF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $2.91M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLLXF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCSRNF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CLLXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CSRNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CLLXF and CSRNF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLLXF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CSRNF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLLXF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CSRNF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLLXF is a better buy in the short-term than CSRNF.

Price Growth

CLLXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -5.93% price change this week, while CSRNF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -0.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.36%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.41% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLLXF($35.1M) has a higher market cap than CSRNF($2.91M). CSRNF YTD gains are higher at: 104.000 vs. CLLXF (-14.677). CLLXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 337K vs. CSRNF (-8.45M). CLLXF has more cash in the bank: 6.71M vs. CSRNF (761K). CLLXF (0) and CSRNF (0) have equivalent revenues.
CLLXFCSRNFCLLXF / CSRNF
Capitalization35.1M2.91M1,205%
EBITDA337K-8.45M-4%
Gain YTD-14.677104.000-14%
P/E Ratio1111.11N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash6.71M761K882%
Total Debt74.7KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLLXF vs CSRNF: Fundamental Ratings
CLLXF
CSRNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
550
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9488
SMR RATING
1..100
91100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8535
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
17100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CSRNF's Valuation (81) in the null industry is in the same range as CLLXF (98). This means that CSRNF’s stock grew similarly to CLLXF’s over the last 12 months.

CSRNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as CLLXF (94). This means that CSRNF’s stock grew similarly to CLLXF’s over the last 12 months.

CLLXF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as CSRNF (100). This means that CLLXF’s stock grew similarly to CSRNF’s over the last 12 months.

CSRNF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLLXF (85). This means that CSRNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLLXF’s over the last 12 months.

CLLXF's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CSRNF (100). This means that CLLXF’s stock grew significantly faster than CSRNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLLXFCSRNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
89%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLLXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CSRNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MLGO0.680.06
+10.00%
MicroAlgo Inc
WGS91.611.82
+2.03%
GeneDx Holdings Corp
CIM14.340.10
+0.70%
Chimera Investment Corp
AGO85.500.53
+0.62%
Assured Guaranty Ltd
COIN355.801.35
+0.38%
Coinbase Global

CLLXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLLXF and ERO have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLLXF and ERO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLLXF
1D Price
Change %
CLLXF100%
+3.48%
ERO - CLLXF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.81%
HBM - CLLXF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.19%
CSCCF - CLLXF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.30%
CRECF - CLLXF
10%
Poorly correlated
+4.02%
CMRZF - CLLXF
2%
Poorly correlated
+2.56%
More

CSRNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CSRNF and CPPMF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSRNF and CPPMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSRNF
1D Price
Change %
CSRNF100%
N/A
CPPMF - CSRNF
6%
Poorly correlated
-5.84%
CPFXF - CSRNF
5%
Poorly correlated
+2.39%
CNIKF - CSRNF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.44%
CMRZF - CSRNF
2%
Poorly correlated
+2.56%
CLLXF - CSRNF
-3%
Poorly correlated
+3.48%
More