CLLXF
Price
$0.52
Change
+$0.02 (+4.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
35.08M
CSCCF
Price
$6.37
Change
-$0.15 (-2.30%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
3.61B
24 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLLXF vs CSCCF

Header iconCLLXF vs CSCCF Comparison
Open Charts CLLXF vs CSCCFBanner chart's image
Callinex Mines
Price$0.52
Change+$0.02 (+4.00%)
Volume$2.26K
Capitalization35.08M
CAPSTONE COPPER
Price$6.37
Change-$0.15 (-2.30%)
Volume$130.84K
Capitalization3.61B
CLLXF vs CSCCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLLXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CSCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLLXF vs. CSCCF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLLXF is a Hold and CSCCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CLLXF: $0.52 vs. CSCCF: $6.37)
Brand notoriety: CLLXF and CSCCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLLXF: 37% vs. CSCCF: 49%
Market capitalization -- CLLXF: $35.08M vs. CSCCF: $3.61B
CLLXF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $35.08M. CSCCF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $3.61B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLLXF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCSCCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CLLXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CSCCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CSCCF is a better buy in the long-term than CLLXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLLXF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CSCCF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLLXF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CSCCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLLXF is a better buy in the short-term than CSCCF.

Price Growth

CLLXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -5.93% price change this week, while CSCCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +2.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

CSCCF is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.41% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSCCF($3.61B) has a higher market cap than CLLXF($35.1M). CLLXF has higher P/E ratio than CSCCF: CLLXF (1111.11) vs CSCCF (62.89). CSCCF YTD gains are higher at: 3.392 vs. CLLXF (-14.677). CSCCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 311M vs. CLLXF (337K). CSCCF has more cash in the bank: 101M vs. CLLXF (6.71M). CLLXF has less debt than CSCCF: CLLXF (74.7K) vs CSCCF (801M). CSCCF has higher revenues than CLLXF: CSCCF (1.36B) vs CLLXF (0).
CLLXFCSCCFCLLXF / CSCCF
Capitalization35.1M3.61B1%
EBITDA337K311M0%
Gain YTD-14.6773.392-433%
P/E Ratio1111.1162.891,767%
Revenue01.36B-
Total Cash6.71M101M7%
Total Debt74.7K801M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLLXF: Fundamental Ratings
CLLXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
94
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
85
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
17
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLLXFCSCCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLLXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CSCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BDORY4.120.02
+0.49%
Banco Do Brasil SA
KLKBY4.11N/A
N/A
Kuala Lumpur Kepong Berhad
ZLDAF0.28N/A
N/A
Zelira Therapeutics Ltd.
WHWRF0.05N/A
N/A
World Houseware
KELTF5.41-0.03
-0.48%
Kelt Exploration Ltd.

CLLXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLLXF and ERO have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLLXF and ERO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLLXF
1D Price
Change %
CLLXF100%
+3.48%
ERO - CLLXF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.81%
HBM - CLLXF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.19%
CSCCF - CLLXF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.30%
CRECF - CLLXF
10%
Poorly correlated
+4.02%
CMRZF - CLLXF
2%
Poorly correlated
+2.56%
More

CSCCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSCCF has been closely correlated with LUNMF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CSCCF jumps, then LUNMF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSCCF
1D Price
Change %
CSCCF100%
-2.30%
LUNMF - CSCCF
73%
Closely correlated
-1.35%
IVPAF - CSCCF
71%
Closely correlated
-2.69%
FMCXF - CSCCF
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.89%
BDNNY - CSCCF
53%
Loosely correlated
-2.64%
ARREF - CSCCF
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.50%
More