CLLNY
Price
$19.55
Change
-$0.28 (-1.41%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
26.18B
26 days until earnings call
SRRLF
Price
$1.34
Change
+$0.31 (+30.10%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
1.25B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLLNY vs SRRLF

Header iconCLLNY vs SRRLF Comparison
Open Charts CLLNY vs SRRLFBanner chart's image
Cellnex Telecom SA
Price$19.55
Change-$0.28 (-1.41%)
Volume$26.92K
Capitalization26.18B
SIRIUS REAL ESTATE
Price$1.34
Change+$0.31 (+30.10%)
Volume$1.2K
Capitalization1.25B
CLLNY vs SRRLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLLNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SRRLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLLNY vs. SRRLF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLLNY is a Buy and SRRLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CLLNY: $19.55 vs. SRRLF: $1.34)
Brand notoriety: CLLNY and SRRLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLLNY: 42% vs. SRRLF: 611%
Market capitalization -- CLLNY: $26.18B vs. SRRLF: $1.25B
CLLNY [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $26.18B. SRRLF’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $1.25B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLLNY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSRRLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CLLNY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SRRLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CLLNY and SRRLF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLLNY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SRRLF’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLLNY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SRRLF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLLNY is a better buy in the short-term than SRRLF.

Price Growth

CLLNY (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +1.03% price change this week, while SRRLF (@Real Estate Development) price change was +30.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +2.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLLNY is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+2.35% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLLNY($26.2B) has a higher market cap than SRRLF($1.25B). CLLNY YTD gains are higher at: 25.598 vs. SRRLF (14.451).
CLLNYSRRLFCLLNY / SRRLF
Capitalization26.2B1.25B2,096%
EBITDAN/A111M-
Gain YTD25.59814.451177%
P/E RatioN/A15.22-
RevenueN/A270M-
Total CashN/A99.2M-
Total DebtN/A1B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLLNY: Fundamental Ratings
CLLNY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
90
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLLNYSRRLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
26%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
23%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
67%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLLNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SRRLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PFGEX28.180.33
+1.18%
Parnassus Growth Equity Investor
GSSSX32.340.20
+0.62%
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Svc
JHQRX33.470.14
+0.42%
JPMorgan Hedged Equity R6
GSAKX19.540.05
+0.26%
Goldman Sachs International Eq Inc A
OSPPX6.61N/A
-0.02%
Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus R6

CLLNY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLLNY and VONOY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLLNY and VONOY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLLNY
1D Price
Change %
CLLNY100%
-1.41%
VONOY - CLLNY
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.58%
SPHXF - CLLNY
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRRLF - CLLNY
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KRYPF - CLLNY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLNXF - CLLNY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SRRLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SRRLF has been loosely correlated with SURDF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SRRLF jumps, then SURDF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SRRLF
1D Price
Change %
SRRLF100%
N/A
SURDF - SRRLF
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HUFAF - SRRLF
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLLNY - SRRLF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.41%
MITEF - SRRLF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CTOUF - SRRLF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More