CLLNY
Price
$19.55
Change
-$0.28 (-1.41%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
26.18B
26 days until earnings call
SPHXF
Price
$0.42
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Capitalization
17.48B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLLNY vs SPHXF

Header iconCLLNY vs SPHXF Comparison
Open Charts CLLNY vs SPHXFBanner chart's image
Cellnex Telecom SA
Price$19.55
Change-$0.28 (-1.41%)
Volume$26.92K
Capitalization26.18B
SM Prime Holdings
Price$0.42
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$8K
Capitalization17.48B
CLLNY vs SPHXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLLNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SPHXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLLNY vs. SPHXF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLLNY is a Buy and SPHXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CLLNY: $19.55 vs. SPHXF: $0.42)
Brand notoriety: CLLNY and SPHXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLLNY: 42% vs. SPHXF: 455%
Market capitalization -- CLLNY: $26.18B vs. SPHXF: $17.48B
CLLNY [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $26.18B. SPHXF’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $17.48B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLLNY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSPHXF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CLLNY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SPHXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CLLNY is a better buy in the long-term than SPHXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLLNY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SPHXF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLLNY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SPHXF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLLNY is a better buy in the short-term than SPHXF.

Price Growth

CLLNY (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +1.03% price change this week, while SPHXF (@Real Estate Development) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +2.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLLNY is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+2.35% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLLNY($26.2B) has a higher market cap than SPHXF($17.5B). CLLNY YTD gains are higher at: 25.598 vs. SPHXF (-9.391).
CLLNYSPHXFCLLNY / SPHXF
Capitalization26.2B17.5B150%
EBITDAN/A66.5B-
Gain YTD25.598-9.391-273%
P/E RatioN/A28.49-
RevenueN/A111B-
Total CashN/A25.2B-
Total DebtN/A344B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLLNY vs SPHXF: Fundamental Ratings
CLLNY
SPHXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9065
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4976
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1081
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SPHXF's Valuation (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLLNY (99). This means that SPHXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLLNY’s over the last 12 months.

SPHXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CLLNY (100). This means that SPHXF’s stock grew similarly to CLLNY’s over the last 12 months.

SPHXF's SMR Rating (65) in the null industry is in the same range as CLLNY (90). This means that SPHXF’s stock grew similarly to CLLNY’s over the last 12 months.

CLLNY's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as SPHXF (76). This means that CLLNY’s stock grew similarly to SPHXF’s over the last 12 months.

CLLNY's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SPHXF (81). This means that CLLNY’s stock grew significantly faster than SPHXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLLNYSPHXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
31%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
33%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
10%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
24%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
67%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLLNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SPHXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GEN30.490.68
+2.28%
Gen Digital
GOCO5.930.07
+1.19%
GoHealth
INTA48.110.27
+0.56%
Intapp
EZGO0.33N/A
N/A
EZGO Technologies Ltd
CDNA19.24-0.25
-1.28%
CareDx

CLLNY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLLNY and VONOY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLLNY and VONOY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLLNY
1D Price
Change %
CLLNY100%
-1.41%
VONOY - CLLNY
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.58%
SPHXF - CLLNY
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRRLF - CLLNY
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KRYPF - CLLNY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLNXF - CLLNY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SPHXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPHXF has been loosely correlated with KRYPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SPHXF jumps, then KRYPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SPHXF
1D Price
Change %
SPHXF100%
N/A
KRYPF - SPHXF
48%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BREUF - SPHXF
44%
Loosely correlated
N/A
LLESF - SPHXF
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLLNY - SPHXF
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.41%
AGPYY - SPHXF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More