CLLNY
Price
$14.75
Change
+$0.04 (+0.27%)
Updated
Jan 21 closing price
Capitalization
19.91B
41 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NMRK
Price
$17.93
Change
+$0.18 (+1.01%)
Updated
Jan 22, 10:30 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.21B
21 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLLNY vs NMRK

Header iconCLLNY vs NMRK Comparison
Open Charts CLLNY vs NMRKBanner chart's image
Cellnex Telecom SA
Price$14.75
Change+$0.04 (+0.27%)
Volume$144.39K
Capitalization19.91B
Newmark Group
Price$17.93
Change+$0.18 (+1.01%)
Volume$7.61K
Capitalization3.21B
CLLNY vs NMRK Comparison Chart in %
CLLNY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NMRK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLLNY vs. NMRK commentary
Jan 22, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLLNY is a Hold and NMRK is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 22, 2026
Stock price -- (CLLNY: $14.71 vs. NMRK: $17.04)
Brand notoriety: CLLNY and NMRK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLLNY: 134% vs. NMRK: 67%
Market capitalization -- CLLNY: $19.91B vs. NMRK: $3.21B
CLLNY [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $19.91B. NMRK’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $3.21B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $4.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLLNY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNMRK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CLLNY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NMRK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NMRK is a better buy in the long-term than CLLNY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLLNY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NMRK’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLLNY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NMRK’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLLNY is a better buy in the short-term than NMRK.

Price Growth

CLLNY (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -2.42% price change this week, while NMRK (@Real Estate Development) price change was +0.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -0.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.38%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLLNY is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2026.

NMRK is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (-0.21% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLLNY($19.9B) has a higher market cap than NMRK($3.21B). CLLNY has higher P/E ratio than NMRK: CLLNY (70.00) vs NMRK (31.12). NMRK YTD gains are higher at: 2.364 vs. CLLNY (-5.327). CLLNY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.77B vs. NMRK (394M). CLLNY has higher revenues than NMRK: CLLNY (4.1B) vs NMRK (3.16B).
CLLNYNMRKCLLNY / NMRK
Capitalization19.9B3.21B621%
EBITDA2.77B394M703%
Gain YTD-5.3272.364-225%
P/E Ratio70.0031.12225%
Revenue4.1B3.16B130%
Total CashN/A224M-
Total DebtN/A2.66B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLLNY vs NMRK: Fundamental Ratings
CLLNY
NMRK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7358
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10052
SMR RATING
1..100
9085
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7752
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7085
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NMRK's Valuation (27) in the Real Estate Development industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLLNY (98) in the null industry. This means that NMRK’s stock grew significantly faster than CLLNY’s over the last 12 months.

NMRK's Profit vs Risk Rating (52) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLLNY (100) in the null industry. This means that NMRK’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLLNY’s over the last 12 months.

NMRK's SMR Rating (85) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CLLNY (90) in the null industry. This means that NMRK’s stock grew similarly to CLLNY’s over the last 12 months.

NMRK's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CLLNY (77) in the null industry. This means that NMRK’s stock grew similarly to CLLNY’s over the last 12 months.

CLLNY's P/E Growth Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as NMRK (85) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that CLLNY’s stock grew similarly to NMRK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLLNYNMRK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 30 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLLNY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NMRK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VIS323.345.53
+1.74%
Vanguard Industrials ETF
VRAI24.630.39
+1.59%
Virtus Real Asset Income ETF
EMXF48.640.61
+1.28%
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF
BGB11.930.04
+0.34%
Blackstone Strategic Credit 2027 Term Fund
DVXK28.57N/A
N/A
WEBs Technology XLK Defined Vol ETF

CLLNY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLLNY has been closely correlated with VONOY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLLNY jumps, then VONOY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLLNY
1D Price
Change %
CLLNY100%
+0.27%
VONOY - CLLNY
67%
Closely correlated
-0.14%
CLNXF - CLLNY
49%
Loosely correlated
-3.18%
NMRK - CLLNY
45%
Loosely correlated
+4.17%
MMI - CLLNY
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.62%
STHO - CLLNY
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.59%
More

NMRK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NMRK has been closely correlated with JLL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NMRK jumps, then JLL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NMRK
1D Price
Change %
NMRK100%
+4.17%
JLL - NMRK
82%
Closely correlated
+2.96%
CWK - NMRK
80%
Closely correlated
+2.90%
CBRE - NMRK
79%
Closely correlated
+2.98%
CIGI - NMRK
71%
Closely correlated
+0.34%
MMI - NMRK
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.62%
More