CLLNY
Price
$15.79
Change
+$0.01 (+0.06%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
21.36B
67 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GRGTF
Price
$2.30
Change
-$0.16 (-6.50%)
Updated
Dec 11 closing price
Capitalization
1.8B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLLNY vs GRGTF

Header iconCLLNY vs GRGTF Comparison
Open Charts CLLNY vs GRGTFBanner chart's image
Cellnex Telecom SA
Price$15.79
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
Volume$134.94K
Capitalization21.36B
Grainger
Price$2.30
Change-$0.16 (-6.50%)
Volume$62K
Capitalization1.8B
CLLNY vs GRGTF Comparison Chart in %
CLLNY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GRGTF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLLNY vs. GRGTF commentary
Dec 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLLNY is a Buy and GRGTF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CLLNY: $15.79 vs. GRGTF: $2.30)
Brand notoriety: CLLNY and GRGTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLLNY: 66% vs. GRGTF: 356%
Market capitalization -- CLLNY: $21.36B vs. GRGTF: $1.8B
CLLNY [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $21.36B. GRGTF’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $1.8B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $4.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLLNY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGRGTF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CLLNY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GRGTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GRGTF is a better buy in the long-term than CLLNY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLLNY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GRGTF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLLNY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • GRGTF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLLNY is a better buy in the short-term than GRGTF.

Price Growth

CLLNY (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +0.83% price change this week, while GRGTF (@Real Estate Development) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -0.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.24%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLLNY is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (-0.17% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLLNY($21.4B) has a higher market cap than GRGTF($1.8B). CLLNY has higher P/E ratio than GRGTF: CLLNY (70.00) vs GRGTF (6.24). CLLNY YTD gains are higher at: 1.337 vs. GRGTF (-21.502). CLLNY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.77B vs. GRGTF (146M). CLLNY has more cash in the bank: 1.32B vs. GRGTF (85.8M). GRGTF has less debt than CLLNY: GRGTF (1.6B) vs CLLNY (21.9B). CLLNY has higher revenues than GRGTF: CLLNY (4.1B) vs GRGTF (259M).
CLLNYGRGTFCLLNY / GRGTF
Capitalization21.4B1.8B1,189%
EBITDA2.77B146M1,897%
Gain YTD1.337-21.502-6%
P/E Ratio70.006.241,123%
Revenue4.1B259M1,585%
Total Cash1.32B85.8M1,536%
Total Debt21.9B1.6B1,372%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLLNY: Fundamental Ratings
CLLNY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
11
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
90
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
58
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
71
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLLNYGRGTF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLLNY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GRGTF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EVG10.960.05
+0.46%
Eaton Vance Short Duration Diversified Income Fund
SCEC25.520.01
+0.02%
Sterling Capital Enhanced Core Bond ETF
MUSQ27.90N/A
N/A
MUSQ Global Music Industry Idx ETF
QLD72.68-0.05
-0.07%
ProShares Ultra QQQ
LDP21.10-0.02
-0.09%
Cohen & Steers Limited

CLLNY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLLNY has been closely correlated with VONOY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLLNY jumps, then VONOY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLLNY
1D Price
Change %
CLLNY100%
+0.06%
VONOY - CLLNY
67%
Closely correlated
+0.07%
CLNXF - CLLNY
49%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NMRK - CLLNY
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.23%
MMI - CLLNY
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.08%
STHO - CLLNY
43%
Loosely correlated
+4.24%
More

GRGTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRGTF and SURDF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRGTF and SURDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRGTF
1D Price
Change %
GRGTF100%
N/A
SURDF - GRGTF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLLNY - GRGTF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.06%
SWPFF - GRGTF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VNNVF - GRGTF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.55%
VGPBF - GRGTF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More