Advertisement
CLLNY vs CNPPF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLLNY is a Buy and CNPPF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLLNY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCNPPF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CLLNY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- CNPPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLLNY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CNPPF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CLLNY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
- CNPPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CLLNY (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +0.83% price change this week, while CNPPF (@Real Estate Development) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -0.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.24%.
Reported Earning Dates
CLLNY is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Real Estate Development (-0.17% weekly)Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.
| CLLNY | CNPPF | CLLNY / CNPPF | |
| Capitalization | 21.4B | 1.96B | 1,092% |
| EBITDA | 2.77B | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.337 | -8.188 | -16% |
| P/E Ratio | 70.00 | 9.13 | 767% |
| Revenue | 4.1B | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 1.32B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 21.9B | N/A | - |
CLLNY | CNPPF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 11 | 98 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | 19 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 96 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | 23 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 77 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 71 | 73 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CNPPF's Valuation (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLLNY (100). This means that CNPPF’s stock grew significantly faster than CLLNY’s over the last 12 months.
CNPPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as CLLNY (100). This means that CNPPF’s stock grew similarly to CLLNY’s over the last 12 months.
CNPPF's SMR Rating (23) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLLNY (90). This means that CNPPF’s stock grew significantly faster than CLLNY’s over the last 12 months.
CLLNY's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as CNPPF (77). This means that CLLNY’s stock grew similarly to CNPPF’s over the last 12 months.
CLLNY's P/E Growth Rating (71) in the null industry is in the same range as CNPPF (73). This means that CLLNY’s stock grew similarly to CNPPF’s over the last 12 months.
| CLLNY | CNPPF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 36% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 40% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 26% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 40% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 32% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 25% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 41% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EVG | 10.96 | 0.05 | +0.46% |
| Eaton Vance Short Duration Diversified Income Fund | |||
| SCEC | 25.52 | 0.01 | +0.02% |
| Sterling Capital Enhanced Core Bond ETF | |||
| MUSQ | 27.90 | N/A | N/A |
| MUSQ Global Music Industry Idx ETF | |||
| QLD | 72.68 | -0.05 | -0.07% |
| ProShares Ultra QQQ | |||
| LDP | 21.10 | -0.02 | -0.09% |
| Cohen & Steers Limited | |||
CLLNY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLLNY has been closely correlated with VONOY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLLNY jumps, then VONOY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLLNY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLLNY | 100% | +0.06% | ||
| VONOY - CLLNY | 67% Closely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| CLNXF - CLLNY | 49% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| NMRK - CLLNY | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.23% | ||
| MMI - CLLNY | 44% Loosely correlated | -1.08% | ||
| STHO - CLLNY | 43% Loosely correlated | +4.24% | ||
More | ||||
CNPPF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CNPPF and KOJAF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CNPPF and KOJAF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CNPPF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNPPF | 100% | N/A | ||
| KOJAF - CNPPF | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CLNXF - CNPPF | -6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CLLNY - CNPPF | -7% Poorly correlated | +0.06% | ||
| CPTP - CNPPF | -7% Poorly correlated | N/A |