CLLNY
Price
$17.09
Change
+$0.35 (+2.09%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
23.36B
19 days until earnings call
CLNXF
Price
$34.99
Change
+$1.17 (+3.46%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
23.36B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLLNY vs CLNXF

Header iconCLLNY vs CLNXF Comparison
Open Charts CLLNY vs CLNXFBanner chart's image
Cellnex Telecom SA
Price$17.09
Change+$0.35 (+2.09%)
Volume$77.75K
Capitalization23.36B
Cellnex Telecom SA
Price$34.99
Change+$1.17 (+3.46%)
Volume$223
Capitalization23.36B
CLLNY vs CLNXF Comparison Chart in %
CLLNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLNXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLLNY vs. CLNXF commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLLNY is a Buy and CLNXF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (CLLNY: $17.09 vs. CLNXF: $34.99)
Brand notoriety: CLLNY and CLNXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLLNY: 90% vs. CLNXF: 25%
Market capitalization -- CLLNY: $23.36B vs. CLNXF: $23.36B
CLLNY [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $23.36B. CLNXF’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $23.36B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $4.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLLNY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCLNXF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CLLNY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CLNXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CLLNY and CLNXF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLLNY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLNXF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLLNY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CLNXF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLLNY is a better buy in the short-term than CLNXF.

Price Growth

CLLNY (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +0.35% price change this week, while CLNXF (@Real Estate Development) price change was +2.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +0.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLLNY is expected to report earnings on Nov 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+0.19% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLLNY($23.4B) and CLNXF($23.4B) have the same market capitalization . CLNXF (79.07) and CLLNY (77.24) have similar P/E ratio . CLLNY YTD gains are higher at: 9.680 vs. CLNXF (8.177). CLLNY (3.15B) and CLNXF (3.15B) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . CLLNY (1.46B) and CLNXF (1.46B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . CLLNY (21.9B) and CLNXF (21.9B) have identical debt. CLLNY (4.09B) and CLNXF (4.09B) have equivalent revenues.
CLLNYCLNXFCLLNY / CLNXF
Capitalization23.4B23.4B100%
EBITDA3.15B3.15B100%
Gain YTD9.6808.177118%
P/E Ratio77.2479.0798%
Revenue4.09B4.09B100%
Total Cash1.46B1.46B100%
Total Debt21.9B21.9B100%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLLNY vs CLNXF: Fundamental Ratings
CLLNY
CLNXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
777
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9999
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7977
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5753
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CLLNY's Valuation (99) in the null industry is in the same range as CLNXF (99). This means that CLLNY’s stock grew similarly to CLNXF’s over the last 12 months.

CLLNY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CLNXF (100). This means that CLLNY’s stock grew similarly to CLNXF’s over the last 12 months.

CLLNY's SMR Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as CLNXF (99). This means that CLLNY’s stock grew similarly to CLNXF’s over the last 12 months.

CLNXF's Price Growth Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as CLLNY (79). This means that CLNXF’s stock grew similarly to CLLNY’s over the last 12 months.

CLNXF's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as CLLNY (57). This means that CLNXF’s stock grew similarly to CLLNY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLLNYCLNXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLLNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLNXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EDOW39.800.31
+0.79%
First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF
OCTP29.620.14
+0.47%
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - Oct
FNOV52.850.24
+0.46%
FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF Nov
IHY21.96-0.05
-0.23%
VanEck Intl Hi Yld Bd ETF
VWO54.38-0.13
-0.24%
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF

CLLNY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLLNY has been closely correlated with VONOY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLLNY jumps, then VONOY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLLNY
1D Price
Change %
CLLNY100%
+2.09%
VONOY - CLLNY
67%
Closely correlated
-1.22%
CLNXF - CLLNY
49%
Loosely correlated
+3.46%
NMRK - CLLNY
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.22%
MMI - CLLNY
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.62%
STHO - CLLNY
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.20%
More

CLNXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLNXF has been loosely correlated with CLLNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLNXF jumps, then CLLNY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLNXF
1D Price
Change %
CLNXF100%
+3.46%
CLLNY - CLNXF
49%
Loosely correlated
+2.09%
VONOY - CLNXF
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.22%
NMRK - CLNXF
33%
Loosely correlated
+1.22%
JLL - CLNXF
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.76%
VNNVF - CLNXF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More