CLLKF
Price
$3.88
Change
+$0.08 (+2.11%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
275.29M
TPGVF
Price
$0.16
Change
-$0.03 (-15.79%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
1.65B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLLKF vs TPGVF

Header iconCLLKF vs TPGVF Comparison
Open Charts CLLKF vs TPGVFBanner chart's image
BICO GROUP AB
Price$3.88
Change+$0.08 (+2.11%)
Volume$12.1K
Capitalization275.29M
Top Glove
Price$0.16
Change-$0.03 (-15.79%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.65B
CLLKF vs TPGVF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLLKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TPGVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLLKF vs. TPGVF commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLLKF is a StrongBuy and TPGVF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CLLKF: $3.88 vs. TPGVF: $0.16)
Brand notoriety: CLLKF and TPGVF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical Specialties industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLLKF: 907% vs. TPGVF: 5%
Market capitalization -- CLLKF: $275.29M vs. TPGVF: $1.65B
CLLKF [@Medical Specialties] is valued at $275.29M. TPGVF’s [@Medical Specialties] market capitalization is $1.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical Specialties] industry ranges from $3.82T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical Specialties] industry is $8.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLLKF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTPGVF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CLLKF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TPGVF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CLLKF and TPGVF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLLKF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TPGVF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLLKF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TPGVF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TPGVF is a better buy in the short-term than CLLKF.

Price Growth

CLLKF (@Medical Specialties) experienced а +10.98% price change this week, while TPGVF (@Medical Specialties) price change was -15.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was +1.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.02%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical Specialties (+1.95% weekly)

Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TPGVF($1.65B) has a higher market cap than CLLKF($275M). CLLKF has higher P/E ratio than TPGVF: CLLKF (90.09) vs TPGVF (22.94). CLLKF YTD gains are higher at: 38.571 vs. TPGVF (-47.771). TPGVF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -122.26M vs. CLLKF (-402.4M). TPGVF has more cash in the bank: 988M vs. CLLKF (860M). TPGVF has less debt than CLLKF: TPGVF (654M) vs CLLKF (1.87B). TPGVF has higher revenues than CLLKF: TPGVF (2.77B) vs CLLKF (2.26B).
CLLKFTPGVFCLLKF / TPGVF
Capitalization275M1.65B17%
EBITDA-402.4M-122.26M329%
Gain YTD38.571-47.771-81%
P/E Ratio90.0922.94393%
Revenue2.26B2.77B82%
Total Cash860M988M87%
Total Debt1.87B654M287%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLLKF vs TPGVF: Fundamental Ratings
CLLKF
TPGVF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3399
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9287
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4589
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8866
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3230

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TPGVF's Valuation (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLLKF (89). This means that TPGVF’s stock grew significantly faster than CLLKF’s over the last 12 months.

TPGVF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CLLKF (100). This means that TPGVF’s stock grew similarly to CLLKF’s over the last 12 months.

TPGVF's SMR Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as CLLKF (92). This means that TPGVF’s stock grew similarly to CLLKF’s over the last 12 months.

CLLKF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TPGVF (89). This means that CLLKF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TPGVF’s over the last 12 months.

TPGVF's P/E Growth Rating (66) in the null industry is in the same range as CLLKF (88). This means that TPGVF’s stock grew similarly to CLLKF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLLKFTPGVF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLLKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TPGVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYPFX9.190.07
+0.77%
Royce Small-Cap Fund Svc
MPSSX20.850.14
+0.68%
BNY Mellon Small Cap Multi-Strategy M
RESGX16.130.10
+0.62%
Glenmede Environmental Accountability
FSSKX83.26N/A
N/A
Fidelity Stock Selec-Class K
JEEDX16.76-0.01
-0.06%
JHancock Infrastructure R6

CLLKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLLKF and FONR have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLLKF and FONR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLLKF
1D Price
Change %
CLLKF100%
+2.11%
FONR - CLLKF
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.23%
TPGVF - CLLKF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LUNG - CLLKF
10%
Poorly correlated
+2.21%
SHC - CLLKF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.90%
BDSX - CLLKF
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.24%
More

TPGVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TPGVF and AMBFF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TPGVF and AMBFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TPGVF
1D Price
Change %
TPGVF100%
N/A
AMBFF - TPGVF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MDXH - TPGVF
21%
Poorly correlated
+4.15%
BCCOY - TPGVF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLLKF - TPGVF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TGLVY - TPGVF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More