CLLKF
Price
$2.56
Change
-$0.28 (-9.86%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
177.52M
LUNG
Price
$1.74
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
70.9M
51 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLLKF vs LUNG

Header iconCLLKF vs LUNG Comparison
Open Charts CLLKF vs LUNGBanner chart's image
BICO GROUP AB
Price$2.56
Change-$0.28 (-9.86%)
Volume$350
Capitalization177.52M
Pulmonx
Price$1.74
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$304.19K
Capitalization70.9M
CLLKF vs LUNG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLLKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LUNG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLLKF vs. LUNG commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLLKF is a Hold and LUNG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CLLKF: $2.56 vs. LUNG: $1.74)
Brand notoriety: CLLKF and LUNG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical/Nursing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLLKF: 22% vs. LUNG: 41%
Market capitalization -- CLLKF: $177.52M vs. LUNG: $70.9M
CLLKF [@Medical/Nursing Services] is valued at $177.52M. LUNG’s [@Medical/Nursing Services] market capitalization is $70.9M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry ranges from $231.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry is $5.66B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLLKF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLUNG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CLLKF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LUNG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LUNG is a better buy in the long-term than CLLKF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLLKF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LUNG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLLKF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LUNG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CLLKF and LUNG are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CLLKF (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LUNG (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was +1.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -0.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

LUNG is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical/Nursing Services (-0.02% weekly)

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLLKF($178M) has a higher market cap than LUNG($70.9M). CLLKF YTD gains are higher at: -8.750 vs. LUNG (-74.374). LUNG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -51.84M vs. CLLKF (-54.8M). CLLKF has more cash in the bank: 596M vs. LUNG (84.2M). LUNG has less debt than CLLKF: LUNG (56.8M) vs CLLKF (1.41B). CLLKF has higher revenues than LUNG: CLLKF (1.87B) vs LUNG (90.5M).
CLLKFLUNGCLLKF / LUNG
Capitalization178M70.9M251%
EBITDA-54.8M-51.84M106%
Gain YTD-8.750-74.37412%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue1.87B90.5M2,061%
Total Cash596M84.2M708%
Total Debt1.41B56.8M2,479%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLLKF: Fundamental Ratings
CLLKF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
93
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
86
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLLKFLUNG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLLKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LUNG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PRNIX30.380.13
+0.43%
Virtus NFJ Mid-Cap Value Inst
BRZKX13.240.05
+0.38%
BlackRock Sust Aware Adg Intl Eq K
PRIGX19.830.03
+0.15%
T. Rowe Price Glbl Val Eq Cl I
GEGTX84.71-0.13
-0.15%
Columbia Cornerstone Growth Inst
GMLPX37.84-0.31
-0.81%
Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infras Instl

CLLKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLLKF and FONR have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLLKF and FONR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLLKF
1D Price
Change %
CLLKF100%
N/A
FONR - CLLKF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
TPGVF - CLLKF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LUNG - CLLKF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SHC - CLLKF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.77%
BDSX - CLLKF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.43%
More

LUNG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LUNG has been loosely correlated with BDX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LUNG jumps, then BDX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LUNG
1D Price
Change %
LUNG100%
N/A
BDX - LUNG
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.59%
UTMD - LUNG
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.04%
KIDS - LUNG
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.97%
SNN - LUNG
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.20%
IQV - LUNG
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.96%
More