CLLEF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
72.24M
LVGLF
Price
$0.14
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLLEF vs LVGLF

Header iconCLLEF vs LVGLF Comparison
Open Charts CLLEF vs LVGLFBanner chart's image
Challenger Gold
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization72.24M
LAKE VICTORIA GOLD
Price$0.14
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$12.43K
CapitalizationN/A
CLLEF vs LVGLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLLEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LVGLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLLEF vs. LVGLF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLLEF is a Hold and LVGLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (CLLEF: $0.06 vs. LVGLF: $0.14)
Brand notoriety: CLLEF and LVGLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLLEF: 5% vs. LVGLF: 16%
Market capitalization -- CLLEF: $72.24M vs. LVGLF: $0
CLLEF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $72.24M. LVGLF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLLEF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLVGLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CLLEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LVGLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CLLEF is a better buy in the long-term than LVGLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLLEF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LVGLF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLLEF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LVGLF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLLEF is a better buy in the short-term than LVGLF.

Price Growth

CLLEF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +4.08% price change this week, while LVGLF (@Precious Metals) price change was -6.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLLEF YTD gains are higher at: 89.274 vs. LVGLF (31.609).
CLLEFLVGLFCLLEF / LVGLF
Capitalization72.2MN/A-
EBITDA6.04MN/A-
Gain YTD89.27431.609282%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue315KN/A-
Total Cash3.8MN/A-
Total Debt468KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LVGLF: Fundamental Ratings
LVGLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLLEFLVGLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLLEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LVGLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HHULF18.62N/A
N/A
Hamburger Hafen Und Logistik Ag
PSORF13.56N/A
N/A
Pearson PLC
RKMSF0.03N/A
N/A
Rokmaster Resources Corp.
RTMNF1.53N/A
N/A
Reitmans (Canada) Limited
CHDRF489.96-24.14
-4.70%
Christian Dior S.E.

CLLEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLLEF and EREPF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLLEF and EREPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLLEF
1D Price
Change %
CLLEF100%
N/A
EREPF - CLLEF
30%
Poorly correlated
-16.88%
LVGLF - CLLEF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.07%
RDYFF - CLLEF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZCTSF - CLLEF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PMDRF - CLLEF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

LVGLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LVGLF has been loosely correlated with EREPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LVGLF jumps, then EREPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LVGLF
1D Price
Change %
LVGLF100%
-0.07%
EREPF - LVGLF
36%
Loosely correlated
-16.88%
VLMGF - LVGLF
24%
Poorly correlated
+4.98%
PLGDF - LVGLF
24%
Poorly correlated
-4.00%
CLLEF - LVGLF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CGLCF - LVGLF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.70%
More