CLLEF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
72.24M
EREPF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.01 (-25.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
5.07M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLLEF vs EREPF

Header iconCLLEF vs EREPF Comparison
Open Charts CLLEF vs EREPFBanner chart's image
Challenger Gold
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization72.24M
Zonte Metals
Price$0.03
Change-$0.01 (-25.00%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization5.07M
CLLEF vs EREPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLLEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EREPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLLEF vs. EREPF commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLLEF is a Hold and EREPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (CLLEF: $0.06 vs. EREPF: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: CLLEF and EREPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLLEF: 5% vs. EREPF: 8%
Market capitalization -- CLLEF: $72.24M vs. EREPF: $5.07M
CLLEF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $72.24M. EREPF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $5.07M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLLEF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileEREPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CLLEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • EREPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CLLEF is a better buy in the long-term than EREPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLLEF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EREPF’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLLEF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • EREPF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLLEF is a better buy in the short-term than EREPF.

Price Growth

CLLEF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +4.08% price change this week, while EREPF (@Precious Metals) price change was -16.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLLEF($72.2M) has a higher market cap than EREPF($5.07M). CLLEF YTD gains are higher at: 89.274 vs. EREPF (-20.000). CLLEF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.04M vs. EREPF (-525.52K). CLLEF has more cash in the bank: 3.8M vs. EREPF (173K). EREPF has less debt than CLLEF: EREPF (0) vs CLLEF (468K). CLLEF has higher revenues than EREPF: CLLEF (315K) vs EREPF (0).
CLLEFEREPFCLLEF / EREPF
Capitalization72.2M5.07M1,425%
EBITDA6.04M-525.52K-1,150%
Gain YTD89.274-20.000-446%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue315K0-
Total Cash3.8M173K2,197%
Total Debt468K0-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EREPF: Fundamental Ratings
EREPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
88
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLLEFEREPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLLEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EREPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MMA1.150.04
+3.60%
Mixed Martial Arts Group Limited
SAP301.095.54
+1.87%
SAP SE
LBTYK10.140.05
+0.50%
Liberty Global Ltd
SMC25.77-0.07
-0.27%
Summit Midstream Corporation
ADV1.31-0.03
-2.24%
Advantage Solutions

CLLEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLLEF and EREPF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLLEF and EREPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLLEF
1D Price
Change %
CLLEF100%
N/A
EREPF - CLLEF
30%
Poorly correlated
-16.88%
LVGLF - CLLEF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.07%
RDYFF - CLLEF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZCTSF - CLLEF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PMDRF - CLLEF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

EREPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EREPF has been loosely correlated with SVGAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EREPF jumps, then SVGAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EREPF
1D Price
Change %
EREPF100%
-16.88%
SVGAF - EREPF
36%
Loosely correlated
-50.00%
LVGLF - EREPF
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.07%
CLLEF - EREPF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFMGF - EREPF
13%
Poorly correlated
-1.18%
ETFLF - EREPF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.92%
More