CLLEF
Price
$0.04
Change
+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Updated
Feb 14 closing price
Capitalization
72.24M
ELMGF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
3.32M
Ad is loading...

CLLEF vs ELMGF

Header iconCLLEF vs ELMGF Comparison
Open Charts CLLEF vs ELMGFBanner chart's image
Challenger Gold
Price$0.04
Change+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Volume$50K
Capitalization72.24M
Element79 Gold
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.09K
Capitalization3.32M
CLLEF vs ELMGF Comparison Chart
Loading...
ELMGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLLEF vs. ELMGF commentary
Feb 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLLEF is a Hold and ELMGF is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 24, 2025
Stock price -- (CLLEF: $0.04 vs. ELMGF: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: CLLEF and ELMGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLLEF: 97% vs. ELMGF: 4%
Market capitalization -- CLLEF: $72.24M vs. ELMGF: $3.32M
CLLEF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $72.24M. ELMGF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $3.32M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLLEF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileELMGF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CLLEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ELMGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CLLEF is a better buy in the long-term than ELMGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ELMGF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ELMGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

CLLEF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while ELMGF (@Precious Metals) price change was -7.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +1.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.80%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+1.52% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLLEF($72.2M) has a higher market cap than ELMGF($3.32M). CLLEF YTD gains are higher at: 10.410 vs. ELMGF (-17.754). CLLEF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.04M vs. ELMGF (-6.27M). CLLEF has more cash in the bank: 3.8M vs. ELMGF (212K). CLLEF has less debt than ELMGF: CLLEF (468K) vs ELMGF (4.48M). CLLEF has higher revenues than ELMGF: CLLEF (315K) vs ELMGF (0).
CLLEFELMGFCLLEF / ELMGF
Capitalization72.2M3.32M2,175%
EBITDA6.04M-6.27M-96%
Gain YTD10.410-17.754-59%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue315K0-
Total Cash3.8M212K1,793%
Total Debt468K4.48M10%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ELMGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ELMGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL245.55-0.28
-0.11%
Apple
BTC.X96273.920000-303.835940
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY599.94-10.44
-1.71%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME26.42-0.62
-2.29%
GameStop Corp
TSLA337.80-16.60
-4.68%
Tesla

CLLEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLLEF and EREPF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLLEF and EREPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLLEF
1D Price
Change %
CLLEF100%
N/A
EREPF - CLLEF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LVGLF - CLLEF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RDYFF - CLLEF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELMGF - CLLEF
1%
Poorly correlated
-12.01%
ZCTSF - CLLEF
1%
Poorly correlated
+8.04%
More

ELMGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ELMGF has been closely correlated with RNDXF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ELMGF jumps, then RNDXF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ELMGF
1D Price
Change %
ELMGF100%
-12.01%
RNDXF - ELMGF
69%
Closely correlated
N/A
AUHIF - ELMGF
65%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SBSW - ELMGF
30%
Poorly correlated
-5.90%
VMSSF - ELMGF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RLYGF - ELMGF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More