Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLIX vs FFLS
CLIX vs FFLS Comparison
Open Charts CLIX vs FFLS
ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF
Price$51.45
Change+$0.06 (+0.12%)
Volume$100
Net Assets8.91M
Future Fund Long/Short ETF
Price$25.01
Change-$0.03 (-0.12%)
Volume$317
Net Assets39.87M
CLIX vs FFLS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLIX vs. FFLS commentary
Jun 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLIX is a Hold and FFLS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFLS has more net assets: 39.9M vs. CLIX (8.91M). CLIX has a higher annual dividend yield than FFLS: CLIX (12.523) vs FFLS (8.788). CLIX was incepted earlier than FFLS: CLIX (8 years) vs FFLS (2 years). CLIX (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than FFLS (1.24). CLIX has a higher turnover FFLS (88.00) vs FFLS (88.00).
| CLIX | FFLS | CLIX / FFLS | |
| Gain YTD | 12.523 | 8.788 | 142% |
| Net Assets | 8.91M | 39.9M | 22% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.24 | 52% |
| Turnover | 95.00 | 88.00 | 108% |
| Yield | 0.30 | 0.16 | 187% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FFLS | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 28 days ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CLIX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLIX has been loosely correlated with GCT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLIX jumps, then GCT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLIX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLIX | 100% | +0.99% | ||
| GCT - CLIX | 56% Loosely correlated | +3.48% | ||
| PDD - CLIX | 54% Loosely correlated | +2.20% | ||
| CPNG - CLIX | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.85% | ||
| CVNA - CLIX | 51% Loosely correlated | -2.35% | ||
| GLBE - CLIX | 50% Loosely correlated | -1.75% | ||
More | ||||
FFLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFLS has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFLS jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFLS | 100% | +0.33% | ||
| NVDA - FFLS | 68% Closely correlated | +1.92% | ||
| MU - FFLS | 62% Loosely correlated | +3.67% | ||
| DELL - FFLS | 62% Loosely correlated | +3.82% | ||
| ASML - FFLS | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.87% | ||
| CRM - FFLS | 56% Loosely correlated | +2.12% | ||
More | ||||