Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLIX vs FFLS
CLIX vs FFLS Comparison
Open Charts CLIX vs FFLS
ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF
Price$59.79
Change-$1.36 (-2.22%)
Volume$1.58K
Net Assets7.47M
Future Fund Long/Short ETF
Price$24.71
Change-$0.03 (-0.12%)
Volume$13.08K
Net Assets40.01M
CLIX vs FFLS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLIX vs. FFLS commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLIX is a Buy and FFLS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFLS has more net assets: 40M vs. CLIX (7.47M). CLIX has a higher annual dividend yield than FFLS: CLIX (31.244) vs FFLS (7.363). CLIX was incepted earlier than FFLS: CLIX (8 years) vs FFLS (2 years). CLIX (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than FFLS (1.24). FFLS has a higher turnover CLIX (57.00) vs CLIX (57.00).
| CLIX | FFLS | CLIX / FFLS | |
| Gain YTD | 31.244 | 7.363 | 424% |
| Net Assets | 7.47M | 40M | 19% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.24 | 52% |
| Turnover | 57.00 | 313.00 | 18% |
| Yield | 0.38 | 0.16 | 238% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CLIX | FFLS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 53% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 54% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 57% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CLIX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLIX has been loosely correlated with CVNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLIX jumps, then CVNA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLIX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLIX | 100% | -2.23% | ||
| CVNA - CLIX | 59% Loosely correlated | -2.94% | ||
| CPNG - CLIX | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.04% | ||
| GCT - CLIX | 51% Loosely correlated | -2.52% | ||
| RVLV - CLIX | 50% Loosely correlated | -2.43% | ||
| GLBE - CLIX | 48% Loosely correlated | -2.60% | ||
More | ||||
FFLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFLS has been loosely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFLS jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFLS | 100% | -0.10% | ||
| NVDA - FFLS | 61% Loosely correlated | -3.58% | ||
| META - FFLS | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.14% | ||
| GTLB - FFLS | 57% Loosely correlated | -5.34% | ||
| CRM - FFLS | 55% Loosely correlated | -2.27% | ||
| MU - FFLS | 54% Loosely correlated | -3.25% | ||
More | ||||