CLILF
Price
$2.10
Change
+$0.13 (+6.60%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
13.16B
SWPFF
Price
$2.32
Change
+$0.07 (+3.11%)
Updated
Jun 16 closing price
Capitalization
14.63B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLILF vs SWPFF

Header iconCLILF vs SWPFF Comparison
Open Charts CLILF vs SWPFFBanner chart's image
Capitaland Investment
Price$2.10
Change+$0.13 (+6.60%)
Volume$2.6K
Capitalization13.16B
Swire Properties
Price$2.32
Change+$0.07 (+3.11%)
Volume$1.67K
Capitalization14.63B
CLILF vs SWPFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLILF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SWPFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLILF vs. SWPFF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLILF is a Hold and SWPFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CLILF: $2.10 vs. SWPFF: $2.32)
Brand notoriety: CLILF and SWPFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLILF: 4% vs. SWPFF: 81%
Market capitalization -- CLILF: $13.16B vs. SWPFF: $14.63B
CLILF [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $13.16B. SWPFF’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $14.63B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLILF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSWPFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CLILF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SWPFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SWPFF is a better buy in the long-term than CLILF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLILF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SWPFF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLILF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SWPFF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLILF is a better buy in the short-term than SWPFF.

Price Growth

CLILF (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +6.35% price change this week, while SWPFF (@Real Estate Development) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +31.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +35.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.94%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+31.35% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SWPFF($14.6B) has a higher market cap than CLILF($13.2B). CLILF has higher P/E ratio than SWPFF: CLILF (22.52) vs SWPFF (14.12). SWPFF YTD gains are higher at: 15.136 vs. CLILF (8.376). SWPFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 11.7B vs. CLILF (1.96B). SWPFF has higher revenues than CLILF: SWPFF (13.5B) vs CLILF (2.88B).
CLILFSWPFFCLILF / SWPFF
Capitalization13.2B14.6B90%
EBITDA1.96B11.7B17%
Gain YTD8.37615.13655%
P/E Ratio22.5214.12159%
Revenue2.88B13.5B21%
Total CashN/A5.91B-
Total DebtN/A21.4B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SWPFF: Fundamental Ratings
SWPFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
97
SMR RATING
1..100
86
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLILFSWPFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
42%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
36%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
53%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
37%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
32%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
28%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
25%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLILF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SWPFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CAPR10.250.23
+2.30%
Capricor Therapeutics
EWBC108.871.42
+1.32%
East West Bancorp
JAGX2.580.01
+0.39%
Jaguar Health Inc
WLYB44.16N/A
N/A
John Wiley & Sons
EXOZ9.91-0.29
-2.84%
eXoZymes Inc

CLILF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLILF and ACNDF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLILF and ACNDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLILF
1D Price
Change %
CLILF100%
N/A
ACNDF - CLILF
26%
Poorly correlated
+4.11%
SWPFF - CLILF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FPH - CLILF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.52%
AWCA - CLILF
11%
Poorly correlated
-1.27%
OMH - CLILF
6%
Poorly correlated
+8.82%
More

SWPFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SWPFF and CLILF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SWPFF and CLILF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SWPFF
1D Price
Change %
SWPFF100%
N/A
CLILF - SWPFF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HBUV - SWPFF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ACNDF - SWPFF
21%
Poorly correlated
+4.11%
GRGTF - SWPFF
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.43%
UOLGY - SWPFF
10%
Poorly correlated
-1.05%
More