CLH
Price
$235.21
Change
+$4.28 (+1.85%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
10.63B
4 days until earnings call
WM
Price
$229.67
Change
-$0.94 (-0.41%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
85.6B
One day until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLH vs WM

Header iconCLH vs WM Comparison
Open Charts CLH vs WMBanner chart's image
Clean Harbors
Price$235.21
Change+$4.28 (+1.85%)
Volume$357.97K
Capitalization10.63B
Waste Management
Price$229.67
Change-$0.94 (-0.41%)
Volume$1.13M
Capitalization85.6B
CLH vs WM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLH vs. WM commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLH is a StrongBuy and WM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CLH: $235.21 vs. WM: $229.67)
Brand notoriety: CLH and WM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLH: 109% vs. WM: 74%
Market capitalization -- CLH: $10.63B vs. WM: $85.6B
CLH [@Environmental Services] is valued at $10.63B. WM’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $85.6B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $85.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $6.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CLH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, WM is a better buy in the long-term than CLH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLH’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLH’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • WM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLH is a better buy in the short-term than WM.

Price Growth

CLH (@Environmental Services) experienced а +3.27% price change this week, while WM (@Environmental Services) price change was +1.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was +3.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.11%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLH is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

WM is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (+3.39% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WM($85.6B) has a higher market cap than CLH($10.6B). WM has higher P/E ratio than CLH: WM (37.62) vs CLH (28.35). WM YTD gains are higher at: 14.635 vs. CLH (2.203). WM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.59B vs. CLH (990M). CLH has more cash in the bank: 551M vs. WM (458M). CLH has less debt than WM: CLH (2.49B) vs WM (16.2B). WM has higher revenues than CLH: WM (20.4B) vs CLH (5.41B).
CLHWMCLH / WM
Capitalization10.6B85.6B12%
EBITDA990M5.59B18%
Gain YTD2.20314.63515%
P/E Ratio28.3537.6275%
Revenue5.41B20.4B27%
Total Cash551M458M120%
Total Debt2.49B16.2B15%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLH vs WM: Fundamental Ratings
CLH
WM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
788
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
173
SMR RATING
1..100
5328
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5755
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5343
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CLH's Valuation (77) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as WM (85). This means that CLH’s stock grew similarly to WM’s over the last 12 months.

WM's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as CLH (17). This means that WM’s stock grew similarly to CLH’s over the last 12 months.

WM's SMR Rating (28) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as CLH (53). This means that WM’s stock grew similarly to CLH’s over the last 12 months.

WM's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as CLH (57). This means that WM’s stock grew similarly to CLH’s over the last 12 months.

WM's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as CLH (53). This means that WM’s stock grew similarly to CLH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLHWM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
40%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ZROZ64.190.60
+0.94%
PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon US Trs ETF
REVS27.130.15
+0.56%
Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF
CPLB21.060.04
+0.19%
NYLI MacKay Core Plus Bond ETF
JANP30.73N/A
N/A
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - Jan
SEIX23.62-0.01
-0.04%
Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF

CLH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLH has been loosely correlated with NVRI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLH jumps, then NVRI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLH
1D Price
Change %
CLH100%
+1.85%
NVRI - CLH
55%
Loosely correlated
N/A
WCN - CLH
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.69%
WM - CLH
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.41%
CWST - CLH
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.01%
RSG - CLH
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.02%
More

WM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WM has been closely correlated with RSG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WM jumps, then RSG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WM
1D Price
Change %
WM100%
-0.41%
RSG - WM
83%
Closely correlated
+0.02%
WCN - WM
77%
Closely correlated
-0.69%
CWST - WM
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.01%
GFL - WM
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.40%
CLH - WM
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.85%
More