CLH
Price
$243.13
Change
-$3.92 (-1.59%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
13.04B
72 days until earnings call
LNZA
Price
$0.26
Change
-$0.11 (-29.73%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
60.29M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLH vs LNZA

Header iconCLH vs LNZA Comparison
Open Charts CLH vs LNZABanner chart's image
Clean Harbors
Price$243.13
Change-$3.92 (-1.59%)
Volume$298.55K
Capitalization13.04B
LanzaTech Global
Price$0.26
Change-$0.11 (-29.73%)
Volume$5.15M
Capitalization60.29M
CLH vs LNZA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LNZA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLH vs. LNZA commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLH is a Hold and LNZA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (CLH: $243.13 vs. LNZA: $0.26)
Brand notoriety: CLH and LNZA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLH: 77% vs. LNZA: 237%
Market capitalization -- CLH: $13.04B vs. LNZA: $60.29M
CLH [@Environmental Services] is valued at $13.04B. LNZA’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $60.29M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $91.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $6.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLNZA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CLH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LNZA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CLH is a better buy in the long-term than LNZA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLH’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LNZA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LNZA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLH is a better buy in the short-term than LNZA.

Price Growth

CLH (@Environmental Services) experienced а +2.48% price change this week, while LNZA (@Environmental Services) price change was -20.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was +1.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLH is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (+1.25% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLH($13B) has a higher market cap than LNZA($60.3M). CLH YTD gains are higher at: 5.644 vs. LNZA (-81.029). CLH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.11B vs. LNZA (-108.99M). CLH has more cash in the bank: 699M vs. LNZA (21.2M). LNZA has less debt than CLH: LNZA (64.7M) vs CLH (3.03B). CLH has higher revenues than LNZA: CLH (5.94B) vs LNZA (48.8M).
CLHLNZACLH / LNZA
Capitalization13B60.3M21,559%
EBITDA1.11B-108.99M-1,014%
Gain YTD5.644-81.029-7%
P/E Ratio34.20N/A-
Revenue5.94B48.8M12,176%
Total Cash699M21.2M3,297%
Total Debt3.03B64.7M4,688%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLH: Fundamental Ratings
CLH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
17
SMR RATING
1..100
55
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
12

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLHLNZA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LNZA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GNNDY46.051.23
+2.74%
GN Store Nord A/S
EMITF1.80N/A
N/A
Elbit Imaging, Ltd.
AILLN78.30N/A
N/A
Ameren Illinois Company
STRNY35.50-0.06
-0.17%
Severn Trent PLC
EXSR109.00-1.00
-0.91%
Exchange Bank (Santa Rosa, CA)

CLH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLH has been loosely correlated with NVRI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLH jumps, then NVRI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLH
1D Price
Change %
CLH100%
-1.59%
NVRI - CLH
52%
Loosely correlated
-2.98%
CWST - CLH
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.74%
WM - CLH
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.29%
WCN - CLH
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.02%
RSG - CLH
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.15%
More

LNZA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LNZA and ABAT have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LNZA and ABAT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LNZA
1D Price
Change %
LNZA100%
-30.55%
ABAT - LNZA
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.84%
QRHC - LNZA
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
CLH - LNZA
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.59%
NVRI - LNZA
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.98%
PESI - LNZA
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.44%
More