Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLGPX vs RGACX
CLGPX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts CLGPX vs RGACX
Columbia Large Cap Growth Opp R
Price$18.74
Change-$0.41 (-2.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.32B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.05
Change-$1.88 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
CLGPX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLGPX vs. RGACX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLGPX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. CLGPX (1.32B). RGACX pays higher dividends than CLGPX: RGACX (0.07) vs CLGPX (0.00). CLGPX was incepted earlier than RGACX: CLGPX (9 years) vs RGACX (24 years). CLGPX (1.36) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). CLGPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). CLGPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: CLGPX (0) vs RGACX (250). CLGPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.89 vs. RGACX (8.31). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 37.90 vs. CLGPX (-15.94).
| CLGPX | RGACX | CLGPX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.94 | 138% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.94 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.713 | 19.364 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.32B | 340B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.89 | 8.31 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.13 | 63.31 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.94 | 37.90 | -42% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 98.36 | - |