CLGCF
Price
$0.03
Change
+$0.01 (+50.00%)
Updated
Sep 2 closing price
Capitalization
1.42M
GSISF
Price
$3.15
Change
+$0.10 (+3.28%)
Updated
Sep 2 closing price
Capitalization
3.78B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLGCF vs GSISF

Header iconCLGCF vs GSISF Comparison
Open Charts CLGCF vs GSISFBanner chart's image
Clarity Metals
Price$0.03
Change+$0.01 (+50.00%)
Volume$17.33K
Capitalization1.42M
Genesis Minerals
Price$3.15
Change+$0.10 (+3.28%)
Volume$572
Capitalization3.78B
CLGCF vs GSISF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GSISF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLGCF vs. GSISF commentary
Sep 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLGCF is a Hold and GSISF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 03, 2025
Stock price -- (CLGCF: $0.03 vs. GSISF: $3.15)
Brand notoriety: CLGCF and GSISF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLGCF: 107% vs. GSISF: 31%
Market capitalization -- CLGCF: $1.42M vs. GSISF: $3.78B
CLGCF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $1.42M. GSISF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $3.78B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $91.29B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLGCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGSISF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CLGCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GSISF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GSISF is a better buy in the long-term than CLGCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLGCF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GSISF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLGCF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GSISF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GSISF is a better buy in the short-term than CLGCF.

Price Growth

CLGCF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +7.11% price change this week, while GSISF (@Precious Metals) price change was +3.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +7.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +22.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3851.45%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+7.10% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSISF($3.78B) has a higher market cap than CLGCF($1.42M). GSISF YTD gains are higher at: 88.623 vs. CLGCF (20.241).
CLGCFGSISFCLGCF / GSISF
Capitalization1.42M3.78B0%
EBITDA-518KN/A-
Gain YTD20.24188.62323%
P/E RatioN/A24.59-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash9.76KN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLGCFGSISF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GSISF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FLYD6.730.22
+3.37%
MicroSectors™ Travel -3X Inv Lvgd ETNs
ERX57.640.18
+0.31%
Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X ETF
FMED24.550.05
+0.19%
Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF
DFIP42.23-0.09
-0.21%
Dimensional Inflation-Protected Sec ETF
STXI29.12-0.28
-0.96%
Strive International Developed Mkts ETF

CLGCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLGCF and GSISF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLGCF and GSISF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLGCF
1D Price
Change %
CLGCF100%
+6.15%
GSISF - CLGCF
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.28%
THXPF - CLGCF
9%
Poorly correlated
+3.55%
GRYCF - CLGCF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AUGG - CLGCF
-1%
Poorly correlated
-0.82%
ODV - CLGCF
-4%
Poorly correlated
+1.47%
More

GSISF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSISF has been loosely correlated with MMTMF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GSISF jumps, then MMTMF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSISF
1D Price
Change %
GSISF100%
+3.28%
MMTMF - GSISF
34%
Loosely correlated
+11.90%
MJGCF - GSISF
31%
Poorly correlated
+9.22%
KSSRF - GSISF
24%
Poorly correlated
+26.32%
WKGFF - GSISF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLGCF - GSISF
23%
Poorly correlated
+6.15%
More