Advertisement
CLFD vs SATS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLFD is a Buy and SATS is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLFD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSATS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CLFD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SATS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLFD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SATS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CLFD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- SATS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CLFD (@Telecommunications Equipment) experienced а +6.17% price change this week, while SATS (@Major Telecommunications) price change was +40.12% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was +1.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +52.89%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +1.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.09%.
Reported Earning Dates
CLFD is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.
SATS is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Telecommunications Equipment (+1.78% weekly)The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.
@Major Telecommunications (+1.11% weekly)Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.
| CLFD | SATS | CLFD / SATS | |
| Capitalization | 424M | 30.1B | 1% |
| EBITDA | 9.21M | 2.38B | 0% |
| Gain YTD | -1.129 | 354.061 | -0% |
| P/E Ratio | 68.11 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 179M | 15.5B | 1% |
| Total Cash | 117M | 4.33B | 3% |
| Total Debt | 21.7M | 29.6B | 0% |
CLFD | SATS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 61 | 33 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 69 Overvalued | 87 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 92 | 6 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 78 | 34 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 22 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 41 | 32 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CLFD's Valuation (69) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as SATS (87) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that CLFD’s stock grew similarly to SATS’s over the last 12 months.
SATS's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLFD (92) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that SATS’s stock grew significantly faster than CLFD’s over the last 12 months.
SATS's SMR Rating (90) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as CLFD (90) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that SATS’s stock grew similarly to CLFD’s over the last 12 months.
SATS's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLFD (78) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that SATS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLFD’s over the last 12 months.
SATS's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLFD (100) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that SATS’s stock grew significantly faster than CLFD’s over the last 12 months.
| CLFD | SATS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 76% | 23 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 69% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BFIX | 25.36 | 0.09 | +0.36% |
| Build Bond Innovation ETF | |||
| NUHY | 21.67 | 0.07 | +0.34% |
| Nuveen ESG High Yield Corporate Bd ETF | |||
| GJUL | 41.15 | 0.12 | +0.30% |
| FT Vest U.S. Eq Mod Buffr ETF - Jul | |||
| QCJL | 23.71 | 0.05 | +0.23% |
| FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Cnsrv Buffr ETF - Jul | |||
| CSQ | 19.33 | 0.03 | +0.16% |
| Calamos Strategic Total Return | |||
CLFD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLFD has been loosely correlated with EXTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLFD jumps, then EXTR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLFD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLFD | 100% | -0.03% | ||
| EXTR - CLFD | 49% Loosely correlated | -4.78% | ||
| HPE - CLFD | 47% Loosely correlated | -2.85% | ||
| CRNT - CLFD | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.41% | ||
| UI - CLFD | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| BDC - CLFD | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.67% | ||
More | ||||
SATS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SATS and LITE have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SATS and LITE's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SATS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SATS | 100% | +11.16% | ||
| LITE - SATS | 32% Poorly correlated | +1.57% | ||
| EXTR - SATS | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.78% | ||
| COMM - SATS | 31% Poorly correlated | +1.05% | ||
| GILT - SATS | 31% Poorly correlated | +2.64% | ||
| CRDO - SATS | 30% Poorly correlated | -7.23% | ||
More | ||||