CLF
Price
$11.44
Change
+$0.53 (+4.86%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
5.66B
87 days until earnings call
SMSMY
Price
$10.52
Change
-$1.13 (-9.70%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
2.06B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLF vs SMSMY

Header iconCLF vs SMSMY Comparison
Open Charts CLF vs SMSMYBanner chart's image
Cleveland-Cliffs
Price$11.44
Change+$0.53 (+4.86%)
Volume$28.34M
Capitalization5.66B
Sims
Price$10.52
Change-$1.13 (-9.70%)
Volume$106
Capitalization2.06B
CLF vs SMSMY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMSMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLF vs. SMSMY commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLF is a Buy and SMSMY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CLF: $11.44 vs. SMSMY: $10.52)
Brand notoriety: CLF: Notable vs. SMSMY: Not notable
Both companies represent the Steel industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLF: 82% vs. SMSMY: 3%
Market capitalization -- CLF: $5.66B vs. SMSMY: $2.06B
CLF [@Steel] is valued at $5.66B. SMSMY’s [@Steel] market capitalization is $2.06B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Steel] industry ranges from $33.65B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Steel] industry is $5.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSMSMY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SMSMY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SMSMY is a better buy in the long-term than CLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMSMY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SMSMY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLF is a better buy in the short-term than SMSMY.

Price Growth

CLF (@Steel) experienced а +20.68% price change this week, while SMSMY (@Steel) price change was +0.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Steel industry was +1.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLF is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Steel (+1.65% weekly)

The steel industry includes manufacturers of steel and steel-related products. Companies use iron ore and scrap steel to produce steel. The industry also includes companies involved in mining and marketing of steel products. Along with serving some of the domestic markets, U.S. steel output has, over the years, been used by international economies as well. Competition from imported steel has also increased over time. The industry could be susceptible to business cycles, since the element is an important input in industrial production. Some of the globally-renowned steel behemoths include Nucor Corporation, Vale, and ArcelorMittal SA.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLF($5.66B) has a higher market cap than SMSMY($2.06B). SMSMY has higher P/E ratio than CLF: SMSMY (1578.01) vs CLF (145.67). SMSMY YTD gains are higher at: 43.847 vs. CLF (21.702).
CLFSMSMYCLF / SMSMY
Capitalization5.66B2.06B275%
EBITDA-63MN/A-
Gain YTD21.70243.84749%
P/E Ratio145.671578.019%
Revenue18.6BN/A-
Total Cash57MN/A-
Total Debt7.6BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLF vs SMSMY: Fundamental Ratings
CLF
SMSMY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4450
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7956
SMR RATING
1..100
9393
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3842
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
21
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CLF's Valuation (89) in the Steel industry is in the same range as SMSMY (96) in the null industry. This means that CLF’s stock grew similarly to SMSMY’s over the last 12 months.

SMSMY's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as CLF (79) in the Steel industry. This means that SMSMY’s stock grew similarly to CLF’s over the last 12 months.

SMSMY's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as CLF (93) in the Steel industry. This means that SMSMY’s stock grew similarly to CLF’s over the last 12 months.

CLF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Steel industry is in the same range as SMSMY (42) in the null industry. This means that CLF’s stock grew similarly to SMSMY’s over the last 12 months.

SMSMY's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as CLF (2) in the Steel industry. This means that SMSMY’s stock grew similarly to CLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLFSMSMY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
83%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMSMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SGIGX34.240.18
+0.53%
Steward Global Equity Income Fund R6
WWNPX129.520.61
+0.47%
Kinetics Paradigm No Load
RFNCX89.590.27
+0.30%
American Funds Fundamental Invs R3
APHYX25.66-0.02
-0.08%
Artisan Developing World Institutional
BLRYX11.65-0.01
-0.09%
Brookfield Global Listed Real Estate I

CLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLF has been closely correlated with NUE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLF jumps, then NUE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLF
1D Price
Change %
CLF100%
+4.86%
NUE - CLF
75%
Closely correlated
+3.11%
STLD - CLF
74%
Closely correlated
+3.15%
CMC - CLF
65%
Loosely correlated
+2.72%
ZEUS - CLF
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.49%
RS - CLF
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.60%
More

SMSMY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SMSMY and MSB have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SMSMY and MSB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMSMY
1D Price
Change %
SMSMY100%
-9.70%
MSB - SMSMY
26%
Poorly correlated
+3.49%
CMC - SMSMY
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.72%
CLF - SMSMY
21%
Poorly correlated
+4.86%
ANIOY - SMSMY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NPSCY - SMSMY
2%
Poorly correlated
-2.19%
More