CLF
Price
$14.25
Change
+$0.05 (+0.35%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
8.12B
5 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RS
Price
$336.09
Change
+$56.76 (+20.32%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
17.57B
15 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLF vs RS

Header iconCLF vs RS Comparison
Open Charts CLF vs RSBanner chart's image
Cleveland-Cliffs
Price$14.25
Change+$0.05 (+0.35%)
Volume$17.14M
Capitalization8.12B
Reliance
Price$336.09
Change+$56.76 (+20.32%)
Volume$475.2K
Capitalization17.57B
CLF vs RS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLF vs. RS commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLF is a Buy and RS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (CLF: $14.25 vs. RS: $336.09)
Brand notoriety: CLF: Notable vs. RS: Not notable
Both companies represent the Steel industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLF: 120% vs. RS: 146%
Market capitalization -- CLF: $8.12B vs. RS: $17.57B
CLF [@Steel] is valued at $8.12B. RS’s [@Steel] market capitalization is $17.57B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Steel] industry ranges from $42.88B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Steel] industry is $7.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRS’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, RS is a better buy in the long-term than CLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • RS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLF is a better buy in the short-term than RS.

Price Growth

CLF (@Steel) experienced а -0.14% price change this week, while RS (@Steel) price change was +2.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Steel industry was +0.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +33.40%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLF is expected to report earnings on Feb 09, 2026.

RS is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Steel (+0.37% weekly)

The steel industry includes manufacturers of steel and steel-related products. Companies use iron ore and scrap steel to produce steel. The industry also includes companies involved in mining and marketing of steel products. Along with serving some of the domestic markets, U.S. steel output has, over the years, been used by international economies as well. Competition from imported steel has also increased over time. The industry could be susceptible to business cycles, since the element is an important input in industrial production. Some of the globally-renowned steel behemoths include Nucor Corporation, Vale, and ArcelorMittal SA.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RS($17.6B) has a higher market cap than CLF($8.12B). CLF has higher P/E ratio than RS: CLF (145.67) vs RS (24.44). RS YTD gains are higher at: 16.346 vs. CLF (7.304). RS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.38B vs. CLF (-330M). RS has more cash in the bank: 261M vs. CLF (66M). RS has less debt than CLF: RS (1.69B) vs CLF (8.04B). CLF has higher revenues than RS: CLF (18.6B) vs RS (13.9B).
CLFRSCLF / RS
Capitalization8.12B17.6B46%
EBITDA-330M1.38B-24%
Gain YTD7.30416.34645%
P/E Ratio145.6724.44596%
Revenue18.6B13.9B134%
Total Cash66M261M25%
Total Debt8.04B1.69B476%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLF vs RS: Fundamental Ratings
CLF
RS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8225
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10014
SMR RATING
1..100
9671
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4245
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
315
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5090

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RS's Valuation (13) in the Steel industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLF (89). This means that RS’s stock grew significantly faster than CLF’s over the last 12 months.

RS's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Steel industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLF (100). This means that RS’s stock grew significantly faster than CLF’s over the last 12 months.

RS's SMR Rating (71) in the Steel industry is in the same range as CLF (96). This means that RS’s stock grew similarly to CLF’s over the last 12 months.

CLF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Steel industry is in the same range as RS (45). This means that CLF’s stock grew similarly to RS’s over the last 12 months.

CLF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Steel industry is in the same range as RS (15). This means that CLF’s stock grew similarly to RS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLFRS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RGIVX16.030.24
+1.52%
ClearBridge Global Infrastructure Inc I
EURCHF0.92N/A
N/A
Euro - Switzerland Franc
HKDCHF0.10N/A
N/A
Hong Kong Dollar - Switzerland Franc
RUBCHF0.01N/A
N/A
Russia Ruble - Switzerland Franc
SVOAX13.44-0.09
-0.67%
SEI US Managed Volatility F (SIMT)

CLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLF has been closely correlated with NUE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLF jumps, then NUE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLF
1D Price
Change %
CLF100%
+2.89%
NUE - CLF
66%
Closely correlated
+3.06%
STLD - CLF
64%
Loosely correlated
+3.43%
CMC - CLF
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.85%
WS - CLF
50%
Loosely correlated
+5.14%
RS - CLF
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.21%
More

RS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RS has been closely correlated with STLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RS jumps, then STLD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RS
1D Price
Change %
RS100%
+1.21%
STLD - RS
74%
Closely correlated
+3.43%
CMC - RS
74%
Closely correlated
+1.85%
NUE - RS
71%
Closely correlated
+3.06%
ZEUS - RS
69%
Closely correlated
+3.10%
MTUS - RS
66%
Closely correlated
+2.23%
More